EVIL said:On principle we are very different then, because i would not prefer to see a devisive, self-serving and arrogant talent displace a hard-working, talented player with team ethic. You choose Vassell and Benjani wisely, because you know everybody would like to usher them into history. I agree, but i would prefer a team-oriented pro with loads of ability, Elano does not fit the bill, and i'm guessing Robinho won't cut it either.
I did choose them wisely, but they are being chosen week in week out so it seems clear to me that Hughes does value their "hardworking" approach to Elanos ability.
As for the team oriented pro with lots of ability, I think we all want that. But it won't happen overnight and so we're going to have to make do with people with flaws until we can get that type of player.
I have said before, and it still holds true today, that if Hughes feels the need to get rid of Elano then so be it. I'll be disappointed because I think he has a lot to offer and I think he has given a lot of joy to the supporters. I'm not sure what he has done to engender the hatred that some seem to have for him. But if he goes (and I expect him gone next week) why is there a need to slag him off in the press a week before. It strikes me as petulant, petty and self serving behaviour, and I expect more from a manager of my club.
Hughes might be distant, and that may be his policy, it engenders respect. But what i am sure he positively is, is committed to the team ethic and consistent hard work. Not sure the boys from Brasil have those traits. I'm guessing, don't have a source, that their egos are the problem.
I don't have a problem with a distant manager, although I think the best can change their approach depending on the personality and situation. I don't think players will have respect for a manager willing to leak stuff to the press about their teammates, and it wouldn't surprise me if as a result of the articles from the last couple of days that their is even bigger conflict within the squad.