Lovebitesandeveryfing
Well-Known Member
I went on the match day thread yesterday and I thought Sterling must have been particularly bad given the abuse and vilification that he was getting. I watched the game this morning to see for myself , I think he played well. Given the amount of goals and trophies he has scored \won with the club does he not deserve our respect? In addition I listened to the game on 5 live yesterday. I got the impression that West Ham were the best team in the first half , which turned out to be the exact opposite. The commentators are supposed to describe the game not follow their own agenda. Rubbish from the BBC
It was very easy to get that impression. But in fairness I watched it on SFR/RMC (French tv), only problem was they were hopping back and forth trying to cover all matches on at the same time. I muted the sound (because I can't stand the ignorance of French football commentators on English football), and opened up Radio Manchester for the commentary. The combination of the two sources, along with the OS Matchday feed, did give the impression that West Ham were quite a threat in the first half. Haven't got round to watching City+ yet. Will settle down to that with a drink in the very near future.
But you know, it's a funny thing. I was actually at the home match against Leicester in 2016. The other day, for the very first time since then, I watched the highlights on the OS. Now by their very nature, highlights try to make your own team look as good as possible. But there is simply no way of finessing it — Leicester were all over us in that match. They could easily have scored four or five. But that's not the way I remembered it, or even the way I saw it at the time.