persvenality cult
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 May 2008
- Messages
- 2,855
you can talk all you like, but The Sun and the NOTW, forget about them listening. I have to believe, Custiss and co are so deep in the pockets of the established clubs they don't know what daylight looks like. and if the headline is good, any source will do. They have nearly zero relationship with the club because getting the truth would only hold them back from writing the stories that sell papers. Sorry, that's the way they've become recently. They get so little right, why would anyone buy that paper expecting to learn what's going on in the world of football?
The Star, have a much better record, we know we have someone fighting our corner. And I believe Woolnough is listening to the right people at the club.
Winter is definitely turning. Finally.
Conn and Taylor are well on-side (Taylor did a complete 180 on Mancini, around April time). Hayward isn't listening, but I think it's just natural scepticism.
Ducker has always been a good lad.
but Ollie Holt part of the 'fight back?' I don't think so. He's very anti-mancini, anti-cook, anti-sheik, mistrustful of the whole club after being given the impression MH was safe in his job, a couple of weeks before he was canned.
but it's not the chief scribes, or the manchester correspondants, who worry me.
it's the incidental jobbing writers at places like the Mirror... one of whom called our club 'a whore'. what kind of sub lets that headline through?
That casual 'abuse' is something the club should not allow to pass.
The Star, have a much better record, we know we have someone fighting our corner. And I believe Woolnough is listening to the right people at the club.
Winter is definitely turning. Finally.
Conn and Taylor are well on-side (Taylor did a complete 180 on Mancini, around April time). Hayward isn't listening, but I think it's just natural scepticism.
Ducker has always been a good lad.
but Ollie Holt part of the 'fight back?' I don't think so. He's very anti-mancini, anti-cook, anti-sheik, mistrustful of the whole club after being given the impression MH was safe in his job, a couple of weeks before he was canned.
but it's not the chief scribes, or the manchester correspondants, who worry me.
it's the incidental jobbing writers at places like the Mirror... one of whom called our club 'a whore'. what kind of sub lets that headline through?
That casual 'abuse' is something the club should not allow to pass.