1 thru 10) The speed of our play is the biggest difference. We are pedestrian for RIDICULOUSLY long spells, and unless we are chasing the game!
No-one is afraid of a team that ALLOWS them to set up their defence BEFORE they even try to attack them, and are then completely unwilling to shoot on goal until they have made 20 passes and made the killer pass that creates a 3 yard opening for a striker inside the 18 yard box with enough players to only allow 2 yard openings.
Distant 11) "Plan B" has been 3 at the back, marauding full backs, and TRYING to whip the ball into the box, where we usually have no-one to get on the end of the cross. I'm not sure how many times Džeko has had a ball SPECIFICALLY sent over for him to get his head on it during open play, but I would venture I could count them on one hand.....even though he is our top scorer!
12) If you check the goals we have scored against us, I think you will find that MOST of them occur when we are counterattacked, or have few people in our box. If we had a midfield that played BOTH WAYS, then we would be in better shape late in games. However, we end up playing attack vs defence towards the end of most games, because AT LEAST two of our "midfielders" are either too knackered to defend after 75 mins or feel like they are attackers.
12a) One more thing, look how advanced our full backs were when Barry lost the ball for Soton's first goal. Either we DEFEND when the ball is in our half, or we attack at great speed. However, rolling the ball out to a DM 25 yards out, with both the full backs at the halfway line and no-one making themselves available, then we will ALWAYS get schwacked if the perfect pass does not come off, because with as little speed as we have in central defence when VK and MN are out, we have little margin for error against terrier attackers like Soton had on Saturday.