1894 said:Is that what City aspire to - making up the numbers but winning nothing ?
Point taken my friend. I should have said "I would imagine that they would expect him to do better..." but I thought I was on solid ground. Even as one who is broadly supportive of Hughes I would expect him to do better next season.Soulboy said:Prestwich_Blue said:You've made some unsubstantiated statements there rastus.rastus said:It seems to have escaped some posters attention that we are in an unbelievably strong position.
We have made world record transfer bids for world class players our owners want us to be BIG and made our intentions clear.
They will not accept a push for 7/8th spot and rightly so. They have already invested heavilly in 1 season alone and wanting to sign more class players to get us into a top 4 ASAP, they arnt going to play the slowly, slowly catchy monkey game.
We are in a unique position and our owners will ensure we get there, MH or no MH
After Al-Fahim's wild flights of fancy in Spetember, ADUG were then strongly emphasising it was a long-term project and they realised they needed to be patient. Of course they want progress but it has also been publicly reported that Hughes' agreed target this season was a top ten finish and decent UEFA Cup run. Which he has delivered it would seem.
Next season he will be expected to do better, with a top 6 (preferably 5th place) finish the minimum target.
You have a pop at the poster for his "unsubstantiated" statements... then go on to finish your post off with "Next season he will be expected to do better, with a top 6 (preferably 5th. place) finish the minimum target."
So where is this comment "substantiated"?
When were you party to the meetings with the owners, Cook, Hughes et al where they stated next season a top 6 is the minimum requirement?
If you don't like "unsubstantiated" comments... then don't make some yourself!
moomba said:1894 said:Is that what City aspire to - making up the numbers but winning nothing ?
I wouldn't have thought so.
But finishing top 4 once should really kick us on as a club, players/managers will be more prepared to move. I'd say the PR/marketing side will really push ahead and I would see a top 4 finish as the start of something rather than the ultimate objective for the club.
DontLookBackInAnger said:Reid took over Kendall's side, but I agree that was, perhaps our biggest mistake manager wise. That being said the club's record when it comes to firing mangers is nothing short of amazing, you have to go back to Ron Saunders for one that one anything after leaving city! We might suck at hiring, but generally we are pretty much on the money about letting them go.Joycee Banercheck said:Peter Reid almost did and then got the boot. I've always wondered what would have become of us had we stuck with Reid.DontLookBackInAnger said:No, that being said since I started watching the club in 1979 I don't think other than Kendall we have had any manager that could get us into the top 4
trueblue09 said:WHAT IS WRONG WITH SOME OF YOU!!!!???? yes mark hughes could do it with time and money but i can SAFTLEY say that anybody could do iy with time and money.. sven would do it MUCH MUCH faster david moyes even faster mark hughes is NOT the man for the job and all of you saying given time and money can fuck off any of us could do it with time and money and at least we would have the best wishes of the club at heart and not have a FUCKING ****** in charge
%100 AGAINST hughes