Why The Hell Would Anyone Want Mancini Sacked ?

[Davs 19]

Mancio did this himself. That good post was rubbished wrongly and Mancio cannot accept he's wrong. He twisted a point to rubbish what was a great post which took time and effort.

He's the one out of order, another bigot on the board if you read his posts too.

I'm fully aware of Mancios history mate. I'm also aware of the sometimes trolling style of Dismal & Billy. None of them sit comfortably. At least the later two are Blues though ...............

 

[NipHolmes]

I've been reading an Inter forum for a while, and they say the same thing about Mancini. It's the generally accepted opinions on him from Inter fans.

Funny thing is, when he won the league they were all happy for him and proud that an Italian who managed Inter had won the PL. There are no hard feelings, they just didn't think he was a good enough manager.

I really like Mancini and even named my dog after him but I accept he's a fair bit short on the elite stage that is CL. Hopefully we win the league and do well next year in the CL and Mancini is guiding us but I will have few qualms if he is dismissed for not winning league and is replaced by Pep or Jose, the owners are doing whats best for the club in their eyes, their vision hasn't done us bad so far has it?

If Manicini does go and we come across him and his team down the line his name will be chanted and he will go down in our history as a legend and remembered fondly but hopefully not missed as bad as it sounds.

 

[NipHolmes]

Mancio did this himself. That good post was rubbished wrongly and Mancio cannot accept he's wrong. He twisted a point to rubbish what was a great post which took time and effort.

He's the one out of order, another bigot on the board if you read his posts too.

I'm fully aware of Mancios history mate. I'm also aware of the sometimes trolling style of Dismal & Billy. None of them sit comfortably. At least the later two are Blues though ...............

I have nothing to do with either.

My point is clear, he tarnished a factual post and wrongly claimed 'it was full of factual falsehoods' when his claims are correct and he then tried to wrangle one on a technicality to suit. Bad form.

Don't get the blue comment either. I'd be happy to pm my card and pics of me at ground with little one, nothing to see here. Telling it like it is, if you want to look into something that's not there then break a leg, Mancio was sly if you ask me.

 

[Davs 19]

Mancio did this himself. That good post was rubbished wrongly and Mancio cannot accept he's wrong. He twisted a point to rubbish what was a great post which took time and effort.

He's the one out of order, another bigot on the board if you read his posts too.

I'm fully aware of Mancios history mate. I'm also aware of the sometimes trolling style of Dismal & Billy. None of them sit comfortably. At least the later two are Blues though ...............

I have nothing to do with either.

My point is clear, he tarnished a factual post and wrongly claimed 'it was full of factual falsehoods' when his claims are correct and he then tried to wrangle one on a technicality to suit. Bad form.

Don't get the blue comment either. I'd be happy to pm my card and pics of me at ground with little one, nothing to see here. Telling it like it is, if you want to look into something that's not there then break a leg, Mancio was sly if you ask me.

Sorry mate, the Blue comment was aimed at Mancio, not yourself.

 

[NipHolmes]

I'm fully aware of Mancios history mate. I'm also aware of the sometimes trolling style of Dismal & Billy. None of them sit comfortably. At least the later two are Blues though ...............

I have nothing to do with either.

My point is clear, he tarnished a factual post and wrongly claimed 'it was full of factual falsehoods' when his claims are correct and he then tried to wrangle one on a technicality to suit. Bad form.

Don't get the blue comment either. I'd be happy to pm my card and pics of me at ground with little one, nothing to see here. Telling it like it is, if you want to look into something that's not there then break a leg, Mancio was sly if you ask me.

Sorry mate, the Blue comment was aimed at Mancio, not yourself.

;)

As I said mate, sticking up for the wrongly accused poster.

Anyway that's sorted. Not a fan of posters who come for a player or manager. Bias cannot be put to aside and leads to constant derailment of topics with petty posts on a tangent when said type posters harp on in defense.

My favourite player is Yaya but I accept he's a fair bit away from his best. Dzeko fans claim war when your debate haha.

 

[The Future's Blue]

So basically the problems is one of semantics for Mancio ... in which case there isn't a problem. We've forgiven Mancio plenty of wooden semi literate phrases because we get the point. So the same applies to his Inter supporting friend.

Funnier still, if the conversation were about Mourinho no doubt Mancio would be shitting all over his CL win like a proper Inter supporter.

-- Fri Dec 07, 2012 12:52 pm --

and dont ask me why thats false , you can find it by yourself.

The final score was .... 0 - 3.

So the only "false" thing in his post is, as I say, a question of semantics rather than facts.

the difference between a 0 - 3 on the pitch and a 0 - 3 coming from UEFA becouse of a pitch invasion with referee's hunting is semantic in your mind ?

Whoops! Seems like somebody went to Wiki but didn't read the footnotes. Why would somebody pretend to be an Inter fan just to make Mancini out as shit in the CL?

Didn't Mancini get Inter out of the groups 3 times, winning his league twice? Two quarter finals is no mean feat either, some seem to think he didn't even get past the qualifiers.

 

[Anonymous]

Sorry for the late response:

You've mentioned 5 players out of a squad of 25. Go back and look at Chelsea's squad list for the 10/11 season. You'll find the overwhelmingly vast majority were Mourinho's signings.

9 out of 22 were Mourinho signings with 4 being regular 1st teamers, the other 5 made more sub appearances than 1st team starts.

It can't be more expensive than Mancini wanting fucking Hazard, RVP, and De Rossi. All manager require funds. It's just some get the best out of the players they've bought, and then some want to throw them all out every 18 months and buy new ones.

Mancini didn't get those players though, did he? He wanted to improve the squad further and got signings from List B for whatever reason. Is it that we are no longer going to be spending big? If that's the case what would Mourinho's view on that be? Would he bother with us?

The "circus" of which you speak is actually a case of ridiculous success. That's the circus Mourinho brings. Before you say "but but he's 11 points behind" we're in November. Come talk to me in May about what he achieves this season. Last season he won the league against the best team in the history of football, and got to the CL semi final.

Having said all that, i agree that Ferran and Txiki will perfer Guardiola over Mourinho.

A question for you. How many expensive "failures" does Mourinho have from his Chelsea/Madrid/Porto players. I purposely left out Inter because he spent a lot of Quaresma and he was a total flop.

Mourinho has undoubtedly been a very successful manager at every club he has been at so far. However, he has gone in and put the gold taps on the mansion and proclaimed "look at this house I have built". Whilst you can say that it would be a big surprise if he wasn't successful with us, there is never a guarantee. He won nothing in Europe with Chelsea and has so far won nothing in Europe with Madrid.

At Chelsea, flops (and I guess this is subjective and not all are expensive) Mourinho signed Michael Ballack (who I thought was poor for Chelsea), Jiri Jarosik, Stephen Sidwell and Lassana Diarra. At Inter Milan, Sully Muntari arguably did not live up to billing.

The circus you get with Mourinho is the eye gauging, the snidy comments, encouraging your players to pick up yellow cards, the tapping up of players and the whole untrustworthiness of whether he will stay, go, what the fuck he will get up to next that puts me off the man. That might make me stupid as it should all be about winning, I don't know?

I know that I would rather stick with what we have got until the end of the season and have a look where we are. If we are to bin Mancini, then I would hope we would go for Guardiola rather than Mourinho. The nasty, arrogant, fuck everyone element of Mourinho is far more suited to the swamp dwellers.

 

[Chi-town blues]

Only rags would want Mancini sacked ........
SO keep your eyes open and wise up ..don't eat the bait

 

[hgblue]

Only rags would want Mancini sacked ........
SO keep your eyes open and wise up ..don't eat the bait

There's not a United fan alive who wouldn't shit himself if we hired Mourinho...

 

[Deleted member 52846]

Only rags would want Mancini sacked ........
SO keep your eyes open and wise up ..don't eat the bait

There's not a United fan alive who wouldn't shit himself if we hired Mourinho...

Then they'd realise we'd be no threat to them in two or three years time as we'd drop down the league a little bit after he left to manage Bayern München.