Why The Hell Would Anyone Want Mancini Sacked ?

[Mancio]

So basically the problems is one of semantics for Mancio ... in which case there isn't a problem. We've forgiven Mancio plenty of wooden semi literate phrases because we get the point. So the same applies to his Inter supporting friend.

Funnier still, if the conversation were about Mourinho no doubt Mancio would be shitting all over his CL win like a proper Inter supporter.

-- Fri Dec 07, 2012 12:52 pm --

and dont ask me why thats false , you can find it by yourself.

The final score was .... 0 - 3.

So the only "false" thing in his post is, as I say, a question of semantics rather than facts.

the difference between a 0 - 3 on the pitch and a 0 - 3 coming from UEFA becouse of a pitch invasion with referee's hunting is semantic in your mind ?

 

[Anonymous]

the difference between a 0 - 3 on the pitch and a 0 - 3 coming from UEFA becouse a pitch invasion is semantic in your mind ?

Maybe your Inter supporting friend isn't into making half arsed excuses for shitty European performances.

 

[Mancio]

the difference between a 0 - 3 on the pitch and a 0 - 3 coming from UEFA becouse a pitch invasion is semantic in your mind ?

Maybe your Inter supporting friend isn't into making half arsed excuses for shitty European performances.

the fact is that those werent shit performances. go and see that games then come back and write that they were.

 

[NipHolmes]

no way an inter fan would have wrote this.

this is more than enough to show that all the post is just a joke.

Hahahahahahaha. Get a bastard grip for fucks sakes.

What should he have written? 'We lost 3-0 in the second leg'? Still the same result, point out these facts then?

the facts is that that is not true , its false as is false him being an inter fan.

and dont ask me why thats false , you can find it by yourself.

Ok let's say he got that one wrong, does that still render the rest if his post incorrect even though 90% of it is on the money or are you picking and choosing to suit?

 

[Anonymous]

the difference between a 0 - 3 on the pitch and a 0 - 3 coming from UEFA becouse a pitch invasion is semantic in your mind ?

Maybe your Inter supporting friend isn't into making half arsed excuses for shitty European performances.

the fact is that those werent shit performances. go and see that games then come back and write that they were.

You were losing 3 - 0 when the game was abandoned with less than 20 minutes to play. Your making a dick of yourself by arguing that anything in that post is wrong.

 

[Mancio]

Maybe your Inter supporting friend isn't into making half arsed excuses for shitty European performances.

the fact is that those werent shit performances. go and see that games then come back and write that they were.

You were losing 3 - 0 when the game was abandoned with less than 15 minutes to play. Your making a dick of yourself by arguing that anything in that post is wrong.

bullshit , we were losing 0 -1 with a referee's performance so good that the crown invaded the pitch

-- Fri Dec 07, 2012 12:05 pm --

Hahahahahahaha. Get a bastard grip for fucks sakes.

What should he have written? 'We lost 3-0 in the second leg'? Still the same result, point out these facts then?

the facts is that that is not true , its false as is false him being an inter fan.

and dont ask me why thats false , you can find it by yourself.

Ok let's say he got that one wrong, does that still render the rest if his post incorrect even though 90% of it is on the money or are you picking and choosing to suit?

would a city fan get wrong something about a 6 years ago manchester derby ? no !!!!!

thats more that an evidence that all the post is a fake not coming from an inter fan , based on info coming from maybe wikipedia and only wrote with the intent of throw shit on mancini , and not even worth the effort to read and answer the rest of the bollox that are in that post.

 

[Anonymous]

the fact is that those werent shit performances. go and see that games then come back and write that they were.

You were losing 3 - 0 when the game was abandoned with less than 15 minutes to play. Your making a dick of yourself by arguing that anything in that post is wrong.

bullshit , we were losing 0 -1 with a referee's performance so good that the crown invaded the pitch

-- Fri Dec 07, 2012 12:05 pm --

the facts is that that is not true , its false as is false him being an inter fan.

and dont ask me why thats false , you can find it by yourself.

Ok let's say he got that one wrong, does that still render the rest if his post incorrect even though 90% of it is on the money or are you picking and choosing to suit?

would a city fan get wrong something about a 6 years ago manchester derby ? no !!!!!

thats more that an evidence that all the post is a fake , based on info coming from maybe wikipedia and only wrote with the intent of throw shit on mancini.

In two legged ties, the overall score in the one reported as that's the relevant and important one.

So we're blaming the referee for your 3 - 0 defeat to your rivals? Fair enough ... get your excuses in I'd expect nothing less.

Looking forward to you apologising to your Inter supporting friend though for falsely accusing him of lying when his post is factually correct.

 

[NipHolmes]

the fact is that those werent shit performances. go and see that games then come back and write that they were.

You were losing 3 - 0 when the game was abandoned with less than 15 minutes to play. Your making a dick of yourself by arguing that anything in that post is wrong.

bullshit , we were losing 0 -1 with a referee's performance so good that the crown invaded the pitch

The results final though.
England were cheated by Maradona in 86' but the result stood.

You're fighting a losing battle here and your grasping. That post was on the money and you chose a technicality to rubbish it even though your wrong.

I have no problem with anybodyx but this is an underhanded tactic to 'win' a debate.

Your bias knows no boundaries.

 

[Anonymous]

thats more that an evidence that all the post is a fake not coming from an inter fan , based on info coming from maybe wikipedia and only wrote with the intent of throw shit on mancini , and not even worth the effort to read and answer the rest of the bollox that are in that post.

He's stated facts which you can't dispute which is why your questioning his integrity. It's embarrassing for you because all those facts are easily verifiable.

 

[NipHolmes]

thats more that an evidence that all the post is a fake not coming from an inter fan , based on info coming from maybe wikipedia and only wrote with the intent of throw shit on mancini , and not even worth the effort to read and answer the rest of the bollox that are in that post.

He's stated facts which you can't dispute which is why your questioning his integrity. It's embarrassing for you because all those facts are easily verifiable.

See no evil, hear no evil.