NipHolmes
Well-Known Member
BobKowalski said:NipHolmes said:FantasyIreland said:Its both fascinating and bewildering that their man love is greater than that they have for the club.
I struggle to understand it myself although I can see logic in the view he's guided us to FA Cup glory and the League title. Now I personally believe we would have won silverware regardless as long as we had our current team (or better) and had a top manager. Mancini has been part of our success but not the key reason for our success. I think this is where the problems here start.
For me, Mancini is an employee, he's a small cog in the City machine. There needs to be some perspective and distance from some who seem to get too caught up in things and become biased in their logic. If they 100% believe Mancini is bets option, fair dues, if they choose to keep due to sentiment then that's clouded logic.
What I won't accept or go along with is Mancini being the key man at City, he isn't. The key man is Mansour. Without him Mancini's c.v wouldn't have this recent success and we wouldn't be turning up to see Aguero, Silva and Yaya etc on our pitch.
Talk about clouded logic...
Of course Mancini is a key man in our recent success. He is not the only key man but he is the man tasked with the responsibility of turning Sheikh Mansour's investment into tangible success which makes him very fucking key and its nonsense to suggest otherwise.
He's been a part of it but not the reason for our success. Investment has been the reason. It's one things people harping on about QPR but if you look at Chelsea it's very similar. You buy top players and you will get to the top. Simple as that. Look at Blackburn when they started to spend, had they continued what would have happened? Or was their success solely dependant on the greatness of Dalglish?