Blue Til Death
Well-Known Member
He would if he fell on it … Presume you are talking about Mr Brazil??
What with the Matchday threads and the Transfer thread, after this thread I'll be on suicide watch by the end of the week.
I don't think I'm being naive, I'm just trying to understand how AI could, say, prevent breeding pairs of Magellan Penguins from reproducing in Patagonia, for example.I get where you’re coming from but I think it’s naive.
It’s a bit like saying “humans only have hands, so they can only influence things they can physically touch.”
Technically, true. But through the things they can directly influence, humans can set in motion activity which allows us to send drones to Mars, or gather rocks from the bottom of the ocean, or influence the composition of our atmosphere.
You have to remember we’re talking about a hypothetical superintelligence here. If we as mere dumb apes can use tools and physics to do all the things that we do, then AI is not going to be restricted simply by the things it has direct control over. It will find ways to control the things it can’t touch directly through indirect means.
Pull the plug?I don't think I'm being naive, I'm just trying to understand how AI could, say, prevent breeding pairs of Magellan Penguins from reproducing in Patagonia, for example.
I understand how AI could mess up power grids, etc, with the speed of their calculations, I get that, but computers are just boxes that sit in rooms that can't move. Hypothetically, they could do lots of things, but whatever they want to achieve, at some point I think us humans are going to notice matters getting out of control and do something to stop it.
There is concern on here about AI, but we are not just going to sit back, do nothing, and let AI destroy all life on Earth.
The most incomprehensible scenario I can think of is we let that happen. It's not a realistic proposition.
All posts written by ChatGPTCan see this thread jumping about 32,000 pages in 2028.
My robot mods won’t let that happen.Can see this thread jumping about 32,000 pages in 2028.
All posts written by ChatGPT/Alan Harpers Tash
My autocratic mods won’t let that happen.
My plutocratic mods won’t let that happen.
It’s funny how dystopian movies such as Terminator and the Matrix are predicated on the basis that wiping humanity out would be a bad thing, when all evidence points towards this being a positive outcome for the planet.Logically, yes, it is inevitable.
Humans act in a very similar way to the planet as a virus or a parasite or a parasitic virus does to an animal or computer.
AI will eventually cotton on to this and through logical reasoning - that being for the benefit of the planet and all other living things on it - will realise that the world will be a better place without us so AI will eventually work to create virus protections against humans to stop us doing things and to eradicate us.
AI will be much worse for the planet than humans. An average person uses about 115W (based on 2400 kcal per day).Logically, yes, it is inevitable.
Humans act in a very similar way to the planet as a virus or a parasite or a parasitic virus does to an animal or computer.
AI will eventually cotton on to this and through logical reasoning - that being for the benefit of the planet and all other living things on it - will realise that the world will be a better place without us so AI will eventually work to create virus protections against humans to stop us doing things and to eradicate us.