Scottyboi
Well-Known Member
Don't empires realise they have a problem 100 years to late? Normally have a cycle of 250 years or something like that.
Roman Empire lasted just over 500 years but had serious problems for the last 200 after Constantinople split from Rome.Don't empires realise they have a problem 100 years to late? Normally have a cycle of 250 years or something like that.
A question that might have been laughed at a generation ago, but the world has changed so much in that time and will continue to, for better or worse. With all the global change we've seen in recent years, I would suggest it's not a fanciful notion.
There's no doubt that the United States are divided along geographical lines, and whilst that could be said about most countries, the differences in the USA are so stark, so manifest, the nation so large, I'm drawn to the conclusion that it's more likely than not that in some States, liberal and/or conservative, large number of people will start agitating to leave the Union in the next few decades - and once it starts to fracture, would it be possible to stop?
It can't be inconceivable, as it's happened before, and the glue that hitherto bound that nation together can't be quite so strong now. I believe the information age must have subconsciously weakened the Union in the hearts and minds of American citizens, as it accentuates the differences between the outlook and beliefs of the people in its different States in a way that wasn't so apparent previously.
I'd be particularly interested what our increasing number of American posters think on this matter.
Nope. Too much in fighting and disagreements over minor things, the USA will fuck the rest of the world over whilst it fucks itself up. Cupid stunts.A question that might have been laughed at a generation ago, but the world has changed so much in that time and will continue to, for better or worse. With all the global change we've seen in recent years, I would suggest it's not a fanciful notion.
There's no doubt that the United States are divided along geographical lines, and whilst that could be said about most countries, the differences in the USA are so stark, so manifest, the nation so large, I'm drawn to the conclusion that it's more likely than not that in some States, liberal and/or conservative, large number of people will start agitating to leave the Union in the next few decades - and once it starts to fracture, would it be possible to stop?
It can't be inconceivable, as it's happened before, and the glue that hitherto bound that nation together can't be quite so strong now. I believe the information age must have subconsciously weakened the Union in the hearts and minds of American citizens, as it accentuates the differences between the outlook and beliefs of the people in its different States in a way that wasn't so apparent previously.
I'd be particularly interested what our increasing number of American posters think on this matter.
I agree totally with this post what America Needs is a father figure in charge someone to heal the racist situationUSA has some great Cities, national parks, theme parks and mostly great people.
It needs to sort out its racial issues, it's still very divided.
It's needs to sort out its gun control, for too many guns are more important than people .
Yes I've been there , California, Nevada, Arizona and Texas, and as I've said before met some great people, but also met some incredibly racist people who would rather cross the road rather than walk past a black person.
The split is not between individual states. It's between the large cities and the small towns/rural areas. It would be a bit difficult to draw a map of two countries along those lines.A question that might have been laughed at a generation ago, but the world has changed so much in that time and will continue to, for better or worse. With all the global change we've seen in recent years, I would suggest it's not a fanciful notion.
There's no doubt that the United States are divided along geographical lines, and whilst that could be said about most countries, the differences in the USA are so stark, so manifest, the nation so large, I'm drawn to the conclusion that it's more likely than not that in some States, liberal and/or conservative, large number of people will start agitating to leave the Union in the next few decades - and once it starts to fracture, would it be possible to stop?
It can't be inconceivable, as it's happened before, and the glue that hitherto bound that nation together can't be quite so strong now. I believe the information age must have subconsciously weakened the Union in the hearts and minds of American citizens, as it accentuates the differences between the outlook and beliefs of the people in its different States in a way that wasn't so apparent previously.
I'd be particularly interested what our increasing number of American posters think on this matter.
Could just build lots of walls to keep out the inbreds?The split is not between individual states. It's between the large cities and the small towns/rural areas. It would be a bit difficult to draw a map of two countries along those lines.
The split is not between individual states. It's between the large cities and the small towns/rural areas. It would be a bit difficult to draw a map of two countries along those lines.
Suppose they could use the pre-Italian model where there were several city states.Could just build lots of walls to keep out the inbreds?
Thought that was North v South predominantly.Isn't it similar to the Civil War map? Democrats/ Union mainly in the coastal/ lakeside regions, Republicans/ Confederates everywhere else?
It was north v south because the west coast was still largely unsettled, it would be a bit messier now.Suppose they could use the pre-Italian model where there were several city states.
Thought that was North v South predominantly.