Pretty much. We're meticulous on the men's side, everyone seems to be on the same page and we know what we can/can't do, but I think it'd be a massive stretch to say we're anywhere near as good on the women's side. It's not a coincidence that we're only just moving away from the spine we've had since ~2014, we've not been very good at adding people.
Well whoever signed Lavelle doesn't understand City's policy regarding players - is that what you are saying ?
How stupid is that for a club who is usually meticulous about signings ? Surely there is a lack of communication which needs to be redressed instead of recruiting players who " do not fit " ?
And whoever is responsible for hiring Taylor needs to be questioned too imo.
Most un-City like appointment .
Was appointing Taylor all that different to appointing Cushing previously though?
Feels liks the women are constrained by having to play a 4-1-2-2-1 style like the first team to help build the City brand and philosophy. Personal opinion is that this is why we also appointed Taylor and Cushing - they were from within and would play in the style they were told to play.
I think any managers appointed from other clubs would want to do it how they want. Which is why we appoint from within.
Still doesn't mean Taylor is any good though.