Bigga
Well-Known Member
Eh? If So, what do i need to prove then?
What??
You simply need to frame a POV that there's no come back on.
So far, you have scored zilch, nada, nothing.
Eh? If So, what do i need to prove then?
That does not make sense. Are you pissed. A point of view that theres no comeback from? How does that even work? All points of view (who even uses POV - how old are you?) are subjective so all have a come back. Even yours. I should heed my late mothers advice a not engage with logically challenged individuals...What??
You simply need to frame a POV that there's no come back on.
So far, you have scored zilch, nada, nothing.
I've heard the use of POV is due to spending too much time on certain adult entertainment websites.That does not make sense. Are you pissed. A point of view that theres no comeback from? How does that even work? All points of view (who even uses POV - how old are you?) are subjective so all have a come back. Even yours. I should heed my late mothers advice a not engage with logically challenged individuals...
Ah, would make sense....I've heard the use of POV is due to spending too much time on certain adult entertainment websites.
That does not make sense. Are you pissed. A point of view that theres no comeback from? How does that even work? All points of view (who even uses POV - how old are you?) are subjective so all have a come back. Even yours. I should heed my late mothers advice a not engage with logically challenged individuals...
Lol. Thanks for the laugh... not sure what i have said to generate so much heat from you apart from disagree or put forward an alternative view. Guess doing that on a forum does not compute with your world view. Anyway, i always find these spats tedious when i read others disapearing up thier own poop shoot so will leave it here and hopefully others can get back on topicAre you stupid?
Even if a Point Of View is 'subjective'[a word you love so much], it can be such that a LOGICAL response cannot be had against it because it answers virtually everything.
You can argue nonsense (which you do a lot) or choose the wiser option of keeping your own counsel, when you don't make sense (again which you don't a lot)!
You have displayed nothing logical or 'subjective' which cannot be dismantled.
Ho hum...
Lol. Thanks for the laugh... not sure what i have said to generate so much heat from you apart from disagree or put forward an alternative view. Guess doing that on a forum does not compute with your world view. Anyway, i always find these spats tedious when i read others disapearing up thier own poop shoot so will leave it here and hopefully others can get back on topic
Erm.... this thread is called world cup VAR......Oops.
My own 'poop shoot' says keep it simple, so...
Your arguments against VAR are basic, been done before and is only about this version.
Not the version many want.
But, even in this version, many of your points have been nullified.
Now, it's back on topic and we can get on with it...
Yes.I s this right? Did the ref initially award a penalty for that?
Erm.... this thread is called world cup VAR......
Very suspicious all this. Three unseen individuals controlling the ref in my opinion. Think it's a no from me, after that farce in the Portugal game.
Don't know what happen in the Spain game, but thought it wasn't managed well in the Portugal one.
Took too long to make decisions, possibly seemed to review if players kicked up enough of a fuss.
Few wrong decisions but that's not so much of a problem with VAR, but a ref that couldn't make the right decision even with the benefit of a replay.
He fucked that up, although the initial decision to block restarting play as the VAR needed more time was the correct one.Is time not added on for var review?
x3 mins for var review to take the penalty from 90 mins and substitution in added time an additional +30 seconds?
But ref whistled for full time a lot earlier?