bobmcfc said:ribery is not better than robby imoplatty7 said:I would go for it but only if we bought Ribery ( dreaming i know) to replace robbie
platty7 said:bobmcfc said:ribery is not better than robby imoplatty7 said:I would go for it but only if we bought Ribery ( dreaming i know) to replace robbie
maybe not on pure skill but is still quality and more of a LM as opposed to robbie who is a LWF hence him not being brill at getting back which to be fair isnt what he is there for
Leroy_Blue said:Much would surely depend on whether Robbie still wants to play for us? Don`t keep someone who doesn`t want to play for us
The Fat el Hombre said:Not worrying news, not good news, just bullshit news
Agree but we dont have to ballance the books. was thinking if this did happen i would get Riberry. I would keep robie if it was my choice.bobmcfc said:platty7 said:bobmcfc said:ribery is not better than robby imoplatty7 said:I would go for it but only if we bought Ribery ( dreaming i know) to replace robbie
maybe not on pure skill but is still quality and more of a LM as opposed to robbie who is a LWF hence him not being brill at getting back which to be fair isnt what he is there for
ribery would cost us in excess of 45m anyway so financially it wouldn't be a great move