nijinskybell
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 9 May 2009
- Messages
- 806
Bringing back Tevez could be our new Rodney Marsh moment.
Tevez City said:As far as I rememeber, when Tevez played against Wigan this season he created to clear chances for Richards and Milner :)
Tevez is not more selfish than Aguero in front of the goal, Aguero had his selfish moments this season as well and most of the striker are selfish in front of the goal.
Anyway, regarding the topic, Tevez is not coming back.
Rest sometimes is just as important as fitness. And we know for sure he has gotten lots of that.PhuketBlue said:Dax777 said:Why the fuck would anyone ever say no?
1 I doubt he's even fit let alone match fit or match sharp.
2 I believe we play better without him than with him.
3 His return could result in a certain amount of unrest within the squad.
4 I don't believe believe that we would have any more chance of winning the title with him than without him.
5 I don't like him and would prefer us to win it without him.
themoment said:
Dax777 said:Rest sometimes is just as important as fitness. And we know for sure he has gotten lots of that.But all your objectios forget one thing. You are substituting your judgment for Mancini's. Tevez will never play for CIty, unless Mancini signs off on it. ANd if he does, then he is fit, better, will not cause undue unrest, and we'll have a better chance at the title.PhuketBlue said:Dax777 said:Why the fuck would anyone ever say no?
1 I doubt he's even fit let alone match fit or match sharp.
2 I believe we play better without him than with him.
3 His return could result in a certain amount of unrest within the squad.
4 I don't believe believe that we would have any more chance of winning the title with him than without him.
5 I don't like him and would prefer us to win it without him.
Not because I think so, but because Mancini would have, and I believe in him.
Ah! I see your point :) Then my answer would be I don't know. Since I can't tell what he would bring. But if I was certain he would bring the same drive, determination and work ethic he brought 2 years ago, i'lled probably lean towards saying Yes!PhuketBlue said:Dax777 said:Rest sometimes is just as important as fitness. And we know for sure he has gotten lots of that.But all your objectios forget one thing. You are substituting your judgment for Mancini's. Tevez will never play for CIty, unless Mancini signs off on it. ANd if he does, then he is fit, better, will not cause undue unrest, and we'll have a better chance at the title.PhuketBlue said:1 I doubt he's even fit let alone match fit or match sharp.
2 I believe we play better without him than with him.
3 His return could result in a certain amount of unrest within the squad.
4 I don't believe believe that we would have any more chance of winning the title with him than without him.
5 I don't like him and would prefer us to win it without him.
Not because I think so, but because Mancini would have, and I believe in him.
Of course the decision is with Mancini but the question was would you play Tevez and I explained why I wouldn't.
Dax777 said:City is there first and most important love. City's success is their joy.
Sorry, there's a principle at stake here and a fucking huge one at that. It's bad enough that clubs can charge whatever they want if we wish to buy a player simply because they sniff our rich owners wealth without having the inferiority complex that to be complete and to be able to compete we need a player who can do whatever the fuck he wants to do.ban-mcfc said:it'd be good to have him on the bench if we struggle to score.
don't get me wrong, i really hate him but........
![]()
strongbowholic said:Sorry, there's a principle at stake here and a fucking huge one at that. It's bad enough that clubs can charge whatever they want if we wish to buy a player simply because they sniff our rich owners wealth without having the inferiority complex that to be complete and to be able to compete we need a player who can do whatever the fuck he wants to do.ban-mcfc said:it'd be good to have him on the bench if we struggle to score.
don't get me wrong, i really hate him but........
![]()
We cannot run a football club where players need to be indulge on a whim.
FUCK EM AND SHIP EM OUT.
Exactly.ban-mcfc said:strongbowholic said:Sorry, there's a principle at stake here and a fucking huge one at that. It's bad enough that clubs can charge whatever they want if we wish to buy a player simply because they sniff our rich owners wealth without having the inferiority complex that to be complete and to be able to compete we need a player who can do whatever the fuck he wants to do.ban-mcfc said:it'd be good to have him on the bench if we struggle to score.
don't get me wrong, i really hate him but........
![]()
We cannot run a football club where players need to be indulge on a whim.
FUCK EM AND SHIP EM OUT.
mancini, khaldoon and the rest of the club know exactly what they are doing.