There's certainly no strawman.
My comparison to Lloris is an indication of why it's dangerous to use highlights without context.
With regards Toure marking or tracking Eriksson in the first phase, he forces him into a crowd of no fewer than three players. So I don't buy that.
Then for Son. Toure is stood in the perfect position to cut a ball out from Eriksson to Son if Eriksson plays that ball. Either by design or fluke he picked out Kane who's lovely touch created the goal. It's not five a side, you don't and can't always mark all men.
When Eriksson is in possession between 3 City players, Kane, Son, Rose and Ali are all wanting the ball. Toure is covering 2 of those, Zabaleta has Ali, and Kane's route to goal is blocked. So for me Toure is in the perfect deep lying position one where 9 out of 10 he intercepts the ball.
As for Fernando or Delph, both have both been out a while, Delph for effectively 2 years. Neither have the intelligence or ball retension skills required for a midfield 3 of Silva, De Bruyne & Toure. A midfield 3 that played Spurs off the park.
That's why an opinion based on highlights is bollocks.
I still view it as a straw man because I never said or implied that Toure is utter shit.
I don't know what you mean by "he forces him into a crowd of no fewer than three players." Who forces who into a crowd? Remember, Kolarov has been dragged out of position by Eriksen being left unmarked.
I don't see Toure standing in a perfect position to cut out a cross from Eriksen to Son. Toure is behind the play jogging back. Kolarov is blocking that cross. This is exactly why watching the man should be prioritised over watching the ball (for Toure at that point). Kolarov should be back with Kane and Otamendi, then that could have released one of the centre backs to go to block Son earlier. Kolarov was prevented from being where he needed to be by Eriksen being allowed to drift unmarked. Still Toure had the opportunity to try to get close to Son but did not try to do so.
I'm aware that mistakes will always be made and all players cannot be marked all of the time. What I'm referring to is that Toure didn't ever try to mark anyone during that sequence.
I'm afraid that (unsurprisingly) I disagree that Toure covers two players. In my view Toure is covering 0 players.
I'm aware that Delph and Fernando are more limited players. That's why I posed the question, rather than expressing an opinion which you seem to be attributing to me but which I do not believe I ever offered.
Last edited: