That's fine!SebastianBlue said:What about "decent"?
(And can't anyone have any fun any more?)
Silence does not equal endorsement. He's asked his agent to explore his options - he's said as much. But I doubt Yaya came up with Cakegate.Lancet Fluke said:Marvin said:I see we're still confusing Yaya with his agent.goatersnipple said:Cant have any player upsetting the apple cart.
thats why tevez had to go and mario.
love yaya brilliant playrr but cant have this behaviour do laters yaya
Yaya said Ii an interview with global broadcaster beIN SPORTS
"Because of the brilliant season Man City have had, everybody is talking about me and everything is open.
"My agent, Dimitri, is always on the phone and he knows what he has to do because I trust him a lot.
"We don't know tomorrow, but my focus is on the World Cup and at the end of the World Cup we will see what happens."
Disappointing but not a shock.
It's the agent's ridiculous comments and the way he has gone about it that has made this story such a farce. To state the obvious, Yaya did not make those comments, but what lies behind it is his desire to review his options. He can do that as far as I am concerned, but it would take a club meeting our valuation which would be very high
I expect Yaya to remain a City player next season
But as has been said plenty of times before, as he hasn't spoken out against what his rep has said, we have to assume that Yaya endorses Seluk's actions. So nobody is confusing the two they are just holding Yaya responsible for the actions of the man he is employing to speak for him.
jimharri said:That's fine!SebastianBlue said:What about "decent"?
(And can't anyone have any fun any more?)
No; definitely not!
Marvin said:Silence does not equal endorsement. He's asked his agent to explore his options - he's said as much. But I doubt Yaya came up with Cakegate.Lancet Fluke said:Marvin said:I see we're still confusing Yaya with his agent.
Yaya said Ii an interview with global broadcaster beIN SPORTS
Disappointing but not a shock.
It's the agent's ridiculous comments and the way he has gone about it that has made this story such a farce. To state the obvious, Yaya did not make those comments, but what lies behind it is his desire to review his options. He can do that as far as I am concerned, but it would take a club meeting our valuation which would be very high
I expect Yaya to remain a City player next season
But as has been said plenty of times before, as he hasn't spoken out against what his rep has said, we have to assume that Yaya endorses Seluk's actions. So nobody is confusing the two they are just holding Yaya responsible for the actions of the man he is employing to speak for him.
andhercl said:Hi everyone. First of all, I must say I'm from Chile, and I've been following the forum as a visitor all this year.
Regarding to the "Yayagate", I think that if he stays, he probably will end up just as Riquelme once did in Villarreal under Pellegrini. One thing that the manager doesn't tolerate is the "prima donna" attitude in any player (and that has happen previously in other clubs).
My best to all of you.
AH
I'm no cynic said:If Yaya had just come out and said he'd had a wonderful time at City and he'd been a part of it at a time when the club had become a major force in the game, but he felt that his time was coming to an end and he needed a fresh challenge elsewhere, I'd have happily accepted it. But instead, he's allowed a buffoon to speak out for him and in derogatory terms too. By not slapping down Seluk, Yaya has made himself also look stupid and I can't see any outcome other than to grant him a move if that is what he really wants. Fans will always demand 100% effort from their players, and if Yaya is thought to be playing at 95% instead, he will not like the lack of support he might get.