bobbyowenquiff
Well-Known Member
Before it gets retracted ;-)
This doesn't surprise me. Ratclliffe would not have appointed Berrada (who handled our sponsorships) if there was anything serious against City. He would have done a lot of due diligence. I also think Ratcliffe may be trying to distance himself from the previous regime at United, especially Woodward and Gill who were more fixated on undermining City than they were in driving United forward. You can also be pretty sure that Ratcliffe knows how weak the evidence is against City because the previous Directors at MUFC were in the loop with Masters. I would not be surprised if Masters was cut loose from his role at the PL sooner rather than later.