Erling Haaland

Status
Not open for further replies.
He has a release clause of 63 mil. We can definitely pay if we want to.
Raiola would probably ask for an astronomical fee. He got 20 from the Pogba deal, and this is a much bigger transfer. Wouldn’t be surprised if he asked for 35-50m
 
Raiola would probably ask for an astronomical fee. He got 20 from the Pogba deal, and this is a much bigger transfer. Wouldn’t be surprised if he asked for 35-50m
If we get Messi on a free, we can definitely use the "Messi War-chest" to get us the striker we want. Aguero maintained insane levels and I hope the board realise there's only a few names who can maintain that.
 
Why didn't we go in for him before Dortmund did?
We wasn't prepared to take a chance to see if he could do it in a better league, but, now he's proved his quality, we're not prepared to pay big money for him.
 
Why didn't we go in for him before Dortmund did?
We wasn't prepared to take a chance to see if he could do it in a better league, but, now he's proved his quality, we're not prepared to pay big money for him.
Raiola was still his agent before Dortmund move. I think its pretty clear we won't deal with him and his obscene agent fees.

City have only signed 1 major Raiola client. That was Balotelli 10 years ago.

On top of that Raiola clients are not committed as he wants another big cut after 3-4 years. City clearly value commitment/loyalty from players.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.