Perhaps, I don't use Facebook so can't comment on that. I only read Twitter, I don't contribute as the character limit makes it a poor platform for expressing opinion. I'm thinking more from the publisher view (i.e. the writer of the opinion) and not the consumer view, which, as you say, might be an edited version (honestly or nefariously) by an intermediary - that's another argument.
If he was culling the forums of all the cranks you think you’ll still be here? There’d be no one but Swiss Cheese satirising himself
True enough.
That's why Governments regulate right? Also Governments act contrary to democracy and obfuscate so they aren't always held responsible. Big tech are accountable to share holders and/or consumers, staff or the individual that owns them. Plus Government regulation holds them to account. The consumers are probably low down on that list but before staff. Government is often in cahoots or beholden as well - which I guess is part of your concern.
I'm here all week.
Exactly, if anyone outside of what is deemed moderate is banned the forum commie will certainly be on his way ;-)
Thanks for the history lesson, but there really was no need. Where have I said Hitler was elected President?
www.lrb.co.uk
Undoubtedly ownership of the media is a big concern and currently it clearly lies in the hands of too few individuals but you still avoid my question.
And when it is the elected governments or the officials that are the perpetrators, then who should have the power to censure? this is not an argument, i am wondering what the solution should be in that situation.
Which quite simply, is what companies do.
To be fair, Bob, the last two paragraphs are in your opinion. I doubt that you would swayed from said opinion but, nonetheless it is in your opinion. Much the same with @Rascal who has heartfelt views. Not everyone agrees.