Which is why, I think, that we make a final offer on Kane within the next 2 weeks and if not met, move on. We can't afford to dilly-dally with Levy.There could be over 90 weeks left, it doesn't matter if the evaluations are so far apart.
Yeah I agree, 2 weeks is about the end of the euros and we don't want to take this to deadline day.Which is why, I think, that we make a final offer on Kane within the next 2 weeks and if not met, move on. We can't afford to dilly-dally with Levy.
Yeah I agree, 2 weeks is about the end of the euros and we don't want to take this to deadline day.
If there’s any ounce of truth to the £170m or £100m plus players I wouldn’t even bother wasting our time putting in another offer.Which is why, I think, that we make a final offer on Kane within the next 2 weeks and if not met, move on. We can't afford to dilly-dally with Levy.
Great reasoning and I agree that Haaland has had ridiculous score tallies. However, unlike Kane it's not been in the best league or consistent yet.Right but the only person who compares to him in that league is Lewandowski. At Haaland's age, he wasn't bagging anywhere near as many. In fact, other than his last two freakish seasons, Lewandowski has only bettered Haaland's output twice and that's when playing for a far superior team.
Absolutely. But Haaland still outscored Kane in Europe last season whilst Kane was playing the likes of Ludogorets and Antwerp.
To be clear, I'm not trying to slag off Kane. I'm just saying Haaland's goal tallies have been ridiculous.
Well, it's probably worthwhile if you back either point enough.It is. But as the poster before pointed out, not exactly a worthwhile arguement really.
Well, it's probably worthwhile if you back either point enough.
But I agree, not if you think it's all about stats and not context. Which your entire argument seems to be built upon.
I would definitely spend it on Kane.I ask myself if Spuds had 100m available in the transfer kitty, and Kane played for West Ham, would they spend it on Kane 100m, Jesus 60m or Danny Ings it ain't Kane that's for sure.
We would but Spuds wouldn't, so Kane 100m? hard to refuse if we are to walk away.I would definitely spend it on Kane.
Aguero, Silva, Toure, Kompany had no resale value.I'd swap Kane for either Sterling or Jesus, but that's about it. Kane has ZERO resale fee after his next big contract, while both Sterling and Jesus will recover their fee when sold.
You have absolutely no idea what we have offered for KaneI'd swap Kane for either Sterling or Jesus, but that's about it. Kane has ZERO resale fee after his next big contract, while both Sterling and Jesus will recover their fee when sold.
Based on how the Euros are going, Spurs should snap up this offer because no one else is offering even half what City already (foolishly) have.
Best thing in respect of next season not last.Marvin, not sure if your a raving lunatic or just the biggest windup merchant there is!
They were lucky because we underperformed. COmbination of weakened sides and stupid tactics. It's you who are delusional.You’re being delusional. They didn’t “get very lucky” and they will definitely be competing for the titles.
What a load of crap
They made us underperformThey were lucky because we underperformed. COmbination of weakened sides and stupid tactics. It's you who are delusional.
No we left ourselves wide open and the goal gave them something to defend/counterattack.They made us underperform
No we left ourselves wide open and the goal gave them something to defend/counterattack.
Their league position and performances show you that I aren't all that. Pep did his usual antics.
I respectfully disagree. You’re looking at the goal, I’m looking at the game.No we left ourselves wide open and the goal gave them something to defend/counterattack.
Their league position and performances show you that I aren't all that. Pep did his usual antics.