This.Is resale value really important to us? We're loaded.
I’d prefer Haaland, too, but also think Kane is, at present, a more complete player. Lots of assists as well as goals.Personally, I’d prefer Haaland as he is younger and perhaps has greater potential. Seems increasingly unlikely that he’ll be available this summer though, in which case Kane would a great alternative. Seems like he’s pretty keen on the move too, which always helps.
Personally, I’d prefer Haaland as he is younger and perhaps has greater potential. Seems increasingly unlikely that he’ll be available this summer though, in which case Kane would a great alternative. Seems like he’s pretty keen on the move too, which always helps.
He’d undoubtedly improve us. Considerably.I’d prefer Haaland, too, but also think Kane is, at present, a more complete player. Lots of assists as well as goals.
Took this from the spurs forum's Harry Kane thread and laughed for like 10 mins.
200 million ffs and those spurs guys ofcourse think that's reasonable.
Probably buys Mbappe and Haaland together next year :D
Kane just is so uncool i dont want him in the team.
Haaland is just already a complete charisma machine and a city fan, already scores at a faster rate, is younger, cheaper and way more exciting.
this, as much as i would prefer haaland, kane is a very decent alternative and far far more likelyFor the good of your health mate let it go haha. We don’t have any interest in Haaland and vice versa. You’re going to be very disappointed in a few weeks time when Kane is announced.
Always thought Harry Kayne was destined for City, he is a goal machine. Maybe we think Liam is as good as Haaland if not better and will cost nothing, let’s hope so.Personally, I’d prefer Haaland as he is younger and perhaps has greater potential. Seems increasingly unlikely that he’ll be available this summer though, in which case Kane would a great alternative. Seems like he’s pretty keen on the move too, which always helps.