Harry Kane



another goalposts shifting

"will not be sold.. for less than the price he will be sold for"

soon it'll be "will not be sold without a proper replacement"
 
TonyColemansbagofapples said:
Kane may have a better minutes to goal ratio and can certainly take a penalty. However, is it worth paying £100m+ (less what we could get for Jesus) for that and lose a player who is near as damn it perfect for the pressing game we play? Especially when many on here think Gabby is worth next to fuck all.
Click to expand...
I think Kane is worth 100m
Gabby is worth 60m but whether we help him move for what he has contributed and accept less is the key
I think we need to forget the costs of Kane amd grealish against Jesus and Bernardo
If we can improve the team that’s key
They money is not the key point
 
BLUEBOY67 said:
But we have the technology to rebuild him better than he was before ….. had the doll figure as well - ha ha
Click to expand...
Me too with the bionic eye and roll the foreskin back …. On his arm to find the computer you filthy minded blues.

make a good porno tho Steve Austin with the bionic willy
 
domalino said:
Of those 82 goals, about 80 of them are as a starter too, his figures are massively diluted by getting a lot of short sub appearances.

He'll go and score 30 a season somewhere when he does go.
Click to expand...

Any striker in this team will score goals because of the chances we create. Jesus’ numbers are great…but they should be better.
 
at this point are we thinking it’s kane or nothing? haaland seems unavailable, as does lukaku, andre silva is off to leipzig. where does that leave us? danny ings or darwin nunez…
 
Still a no for me. Shame we couldn’t of used Delap a little more last year in the games that we won comfortably to see if he could step up to the next level. He has great potential.
 
samuelyeboah said:


another goalposts shifting

"will not be sold.. for less than the price he will be sold for"

soon it'll be "will not be sold without a proper replacement"
Click to expand...


Almost as if there was a script.


The exact same was said for Haaland over a month ago as well. Think 'may be sold for less but if it is all upfront' comes next.
 
Tom Connolly said:
at this point are we thinking it’s kane or nothing? haaland seems unavailable, as does lukaku, andre silva is off to leipzig. where does that leave us? danny ings or darwin nunez…
Click to expand...

Haaland and Kane are exactly equally Unavailable/Available. And similarly priced. Lukaku would cost less but seems less keen on leaving, not that there have been meaningful links to him.

Beyond that, who knows.

Edit. Messi is on a free transfer, a free agent, and better than all of the above.
 
Last edited:
Coatigan said:
Haaland and Kane are exactly equally Unavailable/Available. And similarly priced. Lukaku would cost less but seems less keen on leaving, not that there have been meaningful links to him.

Beyond that, who knows.
Click to expand...
If we can’t get Haaland this window I’d rather have Ings and wait till next summer
 
samuelyeboah said:


another goalposts shifting

"will not be sold.. for less than the price he will be sold for"

soon it'll be "will not be sold without a proper replacement"
Click to expand...

It's better than "not for sale at any price". They know Harry's feeling on wanting to go to me it a matter of when not if.

I still think the price will be no where near that (150m) imo.

It sounds to me that Levy is feeding the media that he is fighting for the good of the club by getting a price for him.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top