Jack Grealish

Status
Not open for further replies.
PJRavfc said:
Back again I'm afraid lads. Grealish is due for talks with the Owners, Chief Exec & Dean Smith at some point today. Bid hasn't been accepted yet as they are obviously planning to throw everything at him to keep him but Grealish has already made it clear through his agents that he wants to join City. Problem is he did this with Man Utd last season and then they got hold of him alone and he agreed to stay. Personally I still think he will go this time, massive difference between joining Man Utd or City these days and I think the pull will be too much.

Wouldn't look into him training with the rest of the team too much, he's just fulfilling his duties as per his contract. Interesting that Kane obviously seen that Grealish was as good as done and made a desperate attempt to jump ahead of him though.
Click to expand...

My god there’s new posters on here posted absolutely made up fantasy!
 
So are Villa delaying accepting the bid in the hopes that during that time he will change his mind? City should get back onto his agent and tell him to get Grealish to tell them to hurry the fuck up. He'll have seen the lengths Kane has gone to to get his move so the least he can do is speak with them and say I'm not staying accept the bid.
 
kaz7 said:
So much fucking shit in this thread , nobody knows anything
Click to expand...
But you like me are reading it… who is the mug lol. It has an addictive element to it you have to admit. There are a few absolute whoppers posting so much shit they’re contradicting the shit they posted previously
 
leo_citeh said:
I'm afraid you cannot separate the context. We are not paying £100m for a player out of desperation so he can plug obvious gaps, we're paying a premium fee for a top player to improve even further. The debate whether he's worth that money is irrelevant to it and only time will tell. This is the least of addressing a need/desperation for a player we've had in a transfer window, for a while.

Was Sterling or Stones worth £50m when we bought them? Did that smack of desperation, or did we pay a big fee to get top players who only got better? Did their fee really matter in the end?
Click to expand...
I see you chose Stones & Sterling, not Mangala & Mendy. Well chosen.

Btw, what would you have said about Stones 14 months ago? That’s rhetorical!
 
If they don’t want to sell him why would they accept the bid? City may have to pay more than 100m.
 
Not sure how Villa can ‘accept’ a £100m bid if it is in fact a release clause. He’s free to do what he wants once triggered.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top