Harry Kane

citytill1die84 said:
Repeatedly said he's not for sale but they'll sell at 150m mmmm

That means he's for sale
Click to expand...

Anything is potentially for sale if a stupidly overpriced bid is in.

As it is Kane is not for sale, however if you are daft enough to pay xyz then we will change our mind.

So no at our present bid Kane is not for sale, but potentionally also is

Debruyne is not for sale, but if bayern offered us say £250M for him I would say he would possibly be.


Beside my reply was to a claim spurs have never said he was not for sale which they clearly have done, not whether he is potentially for sale in the next 10 days which he clearly could be.
 
urban genie said:
Anything is potentially for sale if a stupidly overpriced bid is in.

As it is Kane is not for sale, however if you are daft enough to pay xyz then we will change our mind.

So no at our present bid Kane is not for sale, but potentionally also is

Debruyne is not for sale, but if bayern offered us say £250M for him I would say he would possibly be.


Beside my reply was to a claim spurs have never said he was not for sale which they clearly have done, not whether he is potentially for sale in the next 10 days which he clearly could be.
Click to expand...
He's for sale ffs
 
urban genie said:
Anything is potentially for sale if a stupidly overpriced bid is in.

As it is Kane is not for sale, however if you are daft enough to pay xyz then we will change our mind.

So no at our present bid Kane is not for sale, but potentionally also is

Debruyne is not for sale, but if bayern offered us say £250M for him I would say he would possibly be.


Beside my reply was to a claim spurs have never said he was not for sale which they clearly have done, not whether he is potentially for sale in the next 10 days which he clearly could be.
Click to expand...
OK we get what you think - you keep posting the same thing over the past few days - you only have to write it once
 
waspish said:
I’m not bored of it because once We were dealing with Levy I new it be at lest final week to 10 days when we might see some movement.. think it’s all the bullshit in the media what makes it tedious! Think city new from the start how levy operates so we dropped the 100m ages ago let it play out then probably only started talking last week or two. Also looking like we have to sell one player to make it happen..
Click to expand...
Which seems to be easier said than done, I think we'll end up selling a couple of players for knockdown fees to get Kane
 
Theo555 said:
OK we get what you think - you keep posting the same thing over the past few days - you only have to write it once
Click to expand...

What do I think?

All I have said the last few days is I am bored of this and in another post lets bin it off.

This last post was not about my levels of interest or whetger we should sign him but a different subject concerning this.

I clearly am not tuned in for the tense atmosphere of the transfer forums , I shall return to off topic and not bother you anymore
 
urban genie said:
What do I think?

All I have said the last few days is I am bored of this and in another post lets bin it off.

This last post was not about my levels of interest or whetger we should sign him but a different subject concerning this.

I clearly am not tuned in for the tense atmosphere of the transfer forums , I shall return to off topic and not bother you anymore
Click to expand...
Good lad thanks for listening
 
Dont get the negativity on here about Kane.
At £130m+ yes it’s expensive but all it does is weaken our argument against other fans re spending. And we’re getting shit for not paying the fee- so fuck em. If we were in a different financial position then yeah it’s a huge risk that would have financial ramifications for years ahead- but if kane were to fail for 2/3 years we have delap to possibly fill that position or simply buy another striker- it’s not a gamble like samaras was all then years ago.

Looking at last year we were so wasteful, most of the games we dropped points we had twice as many shots as our opponents. Kane is leathal in front of goals and gives us the aerial threat that we have been missing in recent years.

Going with Jesus/Torres/delap this season is a much bigger gamble than paying near £150m for a proven goal scorer
 
nellyonthewing said:
Kane is a 2 year project for a 2 year manager at an over valued price. We would be better having a 4/5 year plan.
Click to expand...
Is that the 2 year manager just starting his 6th season at City? The one the press reliably informed us wouldn't be up to it and, even if he was, would be off after 3 years because he’d be burned out and he never stayed anywhere very long?
 
forevermancity said:
Dont get the negativity on here about Kane.
At £130m+ yes it’s expensive but all it does is weaken our argument against other fans re spending. And we’re getting shit for not paying the fee- so fuck em. If we were in a different financial position then yeah it’s a huge risk that would have financial ramifications for years ahead- but if kane were to fail for 2/3 years we have delap to possibly fill that position or simply buy another striker- it’s not a gamble like samaras was all then years ago.

Looking at last year we were so wasteful, most of the games we dropped points we had twice as many shots as our opponents. Kane is leathal in front of goals and gives us the aerial threat that we have been missing in recent years.

Going with Jesus/Torres/delap this season is a much bigger gamble than paying near £150m for a proven goal scorer
Click to expand...
And a raw Delap is the only natural striker out of those three, like you say Kane is a must
 
The Light Was Yellow Sir said:
Is that the 2 year manager just starting his 6th season at City? The one the press reliably informed us wouldn't be up to it and, even if he was, would be off after 3 years because he’d be burned out and he never stayed anywhere very long?
Click to expand...
And the same one that has guided us to a couple of trophies.....
 
  • Like
Reactions: cbl
next step is to see if he is in the squad vs Wolves tomorrow.

still 255 hours left of the window it can take 6-7 more days to become urgent.
 
mattyb said:
I intend to brother
Click to expand...
Top man matty.

I can't say that I am beyond caring but I am definitely in the "I don't know how Kane will fit in or whether he will be any good for us" camp.

I love the fact that we are in the mix for completing transfers of this magnitude but I am rather sanguine about the whole saga. Que sera sera and all that.

It really wasn't that long ago that I had resigned myself to watching our mediocre team in the forlorn hope that we might get a trip to Wembley at some point and probably would have been happy to see us win a solitary League Cup so after 2011 everything else is just gravy.

@Alan Harper's Tash Gravy definitely can be a good thing. :-)
 
Fordyboy46 said:
Ha ha, yeah accept anything for that useless lump. This late in the window I can see us accepting bids of 30m for Bernardo and Laporte, no way is anybody paying 60m which has been reported for Laporte. Who has that sort of money?
Click to expand...
Chelsea? Surely he’s a better option than Kounde? I’d hate to see him at another prem team
 
spursfan74 said:
its only to CIty he is refusing to answer))), im sure he will though if you state you will pay 160 million, the conversation then will turn into the 20million in add ons on top, if city dont agree then can jog on and sign someone else, we will stick with our unhappy player, thats our problem. There is going to come a time and i dont know when perhaps that time has already passed when its too late and 160 and 20mill add ons wont be enough.
Click to expand...
And yet another plonker appears. Are all spurs fans as stupid as this clown?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top