My bad, didn’t get what you meant, but yesthus we're being pitched to have them about 3, obviously.
My bad, didn’t get what you meant, but yesthus we're being pitched to have them about 3, obviously.
Most aren't.Not doubling every two days then ?, wasn't it 93k thursday ?. Unless people with it have such mild symptoms they aren't bothering getting tested.
No sweat. And it wasn't aimed particularly at you. I'm sure you saw several posts on here that were not much more than political point scoring. We get regular complaints about such posts derailing the thread. That's why a dedicated thread was created in the politics sub forum.Yeah apologies jim. What a fucking carry on this covid shit is.
I do accept that until there is a "cure" or a way of preventing initial infection for life then whilst we have to "learn to live with Covid" that is a loaded statement that comes with conditions and caveats.
Think of all the other things we live with. We have vaccines etc that prevent things like smallpox and polio but these things can still be out there. The way we can control them is with vaccines - thats how you live with them.
From time to time there are outbreaks of nasty shit in parts - often exotic parts - of the world and there is travel advice issued or even travel bans issued by the host nation or our own FCO.
Sometimes despite everything people get sick with stuff like ebola and bird flu and so on and then measures are taken to isolate and treat them away from the rest of society to try and prevent spread.
Now - when you speak to the deniers they say we have to learn to live with it - they don't mean any of the above they mean just ignore everything - make like its June 1990 or something and you should go around unmasked - ignore calls for vaccinations - travel wherever and whenever you want whatever a potential host nation thinks and ignore the advice of health practitioners - thats not learning anything thats just ignoring something and having faith it will just go away
you were fine to the last paragraph. There are the majority who don't want a booster who simply have doubts that having jabs every 3 months when there's no concrete, conclusive need or benefit to not be worth the potential risk. The other vaccines work, by well, working. You don't get jabbed for smallpox every 3 months because it, well, works.I do accept that until there is a "cure" or a way of preventing initial infection for life then whilst we have to "learn to live with Covid" that is a loaded statement that comes with conditions and caveats.
Think of all the other things we live with. We have vaccines etc that prevent things like smallpox and polio but these things can still be out there. The way we can control them is with vaccines - thats how you live with them.
From time to time there are outbreaks of nasty shit in parts - often exotic parts - of the world and there is travel advice issued or even travel bans issued by the host nation or our own FCO.
Sometimes despite everything people get sick with stuff like ebola and bird flu and so on and then measures are taken to isolate and treat them away from the rest of society to try and prevent spread.
Now - when you speak to the deniers they say we have to learn to live with it - they don't mean any of the above they mean just ignore everything - make like its June 1990 or something and you should go around unmasked - ignore calls for vaccinations - travel wherever and whenever you want whatever a potential host nation thinks and ignore the advice of health practitioners - thats not learning anything thats just ignoring something and having faith it will just go away
Quite right. You can usually tell the ones with a garden and some spare space in the house, for whom working from home is no issue whatsoever. (As long as the delivery drivers, doctors, nurses, bin men, supermarket workers, and people who run takeaways don’t say “bollocks to it, I’ll stay at home as well!”)My mate lost his business and I used to work with a guy who threw himself off a bridge in the middle of the first and longest lockdown.
Im with you on the vaccines but let’s not pretend there’s fuck all collateral damage with lockdowns.
And yet many over 65’s still can’t get an appointment and 90%+ of sub Saharan Africa haven’t had one yet. I’m not having a pop at your lad there but we do seem to have got our priorities a bit skewed.My son and his girlfriend (both 22) got their boosters today as walk-ins at a pop up centre in Salford Quays. No queue whatsoever so it might be worth seeing if a pop up will appear near you rather than trying a regular site.
Sage are advising more restrictions might be necessary because they've been told by government to model scenarios where more restrictions might be necessary. It's really that simple.Try to put aside your own feelings on the matter and think logically for a moment.
Why have the Dutch government ordered a lockdown?
Why are SAGE advising that further measures are necessary?
IF the government do act on SAGE’s advice, why will that be?
The answer to all of the above is because they THINK that there is a real possibility, however unlikely, that health systems may be severely compromised. That’s what it’s always about. It is a nightmare scenario that no government wants to face. They may not give a damn about you as an individual, but they sure as hell don’t want to be the ones making horrendous decisions when the time comes.
The less measures people take, the more likely the above scenario becomes.
Some People on here seem to be 100% convinced that the ability of the NHS to treat people will not be compromised. I don’t know how they can be so sure to be honest.
I like your post mate. One thing however is that I don't understand why over the 2 years this has been going why we haven't built extra capacity? Is the nightingale hospital even open now?Try to put aside your own feelings on the matter and think logically for a moment.
Why have the Dutch government ordered a lockdown?
Why are SAGE advising that further measures are necessary?
IF the government do act on SAGE’s advice, why will that be?
The answer to all of the above is because they THINK that there is a real possibility, however unlikely, that health systems may be severely compromised. That’s what it’s always about. It is a nightmare scenario that no government wants to face. They may not give a damn about you as an individual, but they sure as hell don’t want to be the ones making horrendous decisions when the time comes.
The less measures people take, the more likely the above scenario becomes.
Some People on here seem to be 100% convinced that the ability of the NHS to treat people will not be compromised. I don’t know how they can be so sure to be honest.
Nigeria has just disposed of 1 million doses as they are out of date. They have not got the infrastructure to deliver them and that applies to most of Africa. There is no global shortage of vaccines and Serum in India have reduced production as they are getting less orders.And yet many over 65’s still can’t get an appointment and 90%+ of sub Saharan Africa haven’t had one yet. I’m not having a pop at your lad there but we do seem to have got our priorities a bit skewed.
Yes. And why do you think the government might be asking SAGE to run those models?Sage are advising more restrictions might be necessary because they've been told by government to model scenarios where more restrictions might be necessary. It's really that simple.
Agreed. The government should be doing a lot more on a lot of health fronts. I guess they would struggle to provide the doctors and nurses to staff them - a failure of this and many previous governments.I like your post mate. One thing however is that I don't understand why over the 2 years this has been going why we haven't built extra capacity? Is the nightingale hospital even open now?
Not enough people to staff them or any new hospitals.I like your post mate. One thing however is that I don't understand why over the 2 years this has been going why we haven't built extra capacity? Is the nightingale hospital even open now?
To justify the policies they intend to put in place.Yes. And why do you think the government might be asking SAGE to run those models?
Agreed. The government should be doing a lot more on a lot of health fronts. I guess they would struggle to provide the doctors and nurses to staff them - a failure of this and many previous governments.
Completely disagree with the last paragraph mate. It’s lazy, stereotypical nonsense I’m afraid.
If you wander round singing carols, you don’t need to wear one.Emergency in London but 3000 allowed to blast out Yaya/Kolo songs at the darts ! Still as long as I wear my mask for the 60 seconds I am in my local Tesco!
I would imagine space isn’t the issue, it’s trying to recruit doctors and nurses.I like your post mate. One thing however is that I don't understand why over the 2 years this has been going why we haven't built extra capacity? Is the nightingale hospital even open now?