Liverpool Thread - 2021/22

Status
Not open for further replies.
Petetheblu said:
Klopp's got two more years left of coming 2nd, I think he's better than that and will feel pissed at the timing, any other decade and he'd have been the dominant coach in English football.

I'm surprised he's not slung his hook and gone elsewhere. When he does leave, in 2024, LFC will struggle to replace him and I can see a decline for a sustained period. Unless they get a new owner.
Click to expand...

He was happy to play second fiddle to Bayern for years, he's made a career, and a fair amount of dosh, being second best.

Winning the league only led him to f**k up the encore, he can't handle the pressure. He's happier being the nearly man, it gives him ample opportunity to whinge and he's really good at it.
 
Just had a look on RAWK.
Torres deal deliberately overpriced to circumvent ffp rules. Barca are seen as a friendly club of City’s.
ADUG apparently investing into ‘non-third-party’ companies who in turn then invest into City.
Then there’s all the usual City bingo stuff. We’re living in their heads and it’s a death by a thousand cuts! :)
 
JOGAMIGMOG said:
Just had a look on RAWK.
Torres deal deliberately overpriced to circumvent ffp rules. Barca are seen as a friendly club of City’s.
ADUG apparently investing into ‘non-third-party’ companies who in turn then invest into City.
Then there’s all the usual City bingo stuff. We’re living in their heads and it’s a death by a thousand cuts! :)
Click to expand...
You’ve got to wonder whether there are any FSG plants on there.

They are such mugs, they really are. Their owners are taking them for complete fools, hoovering cash out of the club, which could be invested in the squad, and yet their anger is directed at our owners.

It‘s akin to an employee slagging off another employer for paying their staff a Christmas bonus when their employer pays them nothing, despite having a bumper year and paying themselves a massive dividend.

Absolute fucking mugs.
 
kaz7 said:
They didnt moan when they were way ahead of the pack in the season they won it , neither did the pundits , us on the other hand they scream unfair
Click to expand...
In 19/20 after 19 games they were 16 points ahead of second place Leicester and 17 in front of us. I can remember all in the media shouting at the top of their voices how the dipps were ruining footy. Can't you?
 
gordondaviesmoustache said:
You’ve got to wonder whether there are any FSG plants on there.

They are such mugs, they really are. Their owners are taking them for complete fools, hoovering cash out of the club, which could be invested in the squad, and yet their anger is directed at our owners.

It‘s akin to an employee slagging off another employer for paying their staff a Christmas bonus when their employer pays them nothing, despite having a bumper year and paying themselves a massive dividend.

Absolute fucking mugs.
Click to expand...
Great post mate and not too far fetched. It has long been rumoured that they employ bot farms on social media, I think @Prestwich_Blue might have alluded to it in the past
 
jrb said:
Thankfully for you Adrian, 'Massive LFC fan', you won't have to worry about City in 15-20 years time. YNWA, Adrian.

View attachment 33053

Irishman living in Sydney. Massive LFC fan.

Welcome to the world of Man City - owned by a country of unlimited resources. No team can replace a £50m defender who flops with a shiny new £60m defender, but they can. Hard to see how this changes in next 15 or 20 years

Click to expand...


Apart from Mendy (only flop) who btw hasn’t been replaced with a shiny new toy, are these defenders this gimp is talking about?

Danilo is the only one I can think of and he was hardly a flop.

Stones,Walker,Zinchenko,Laporte,Dias,Ake,Cancelo are the only other defenders Pep has signed and they’re all still here.

Same goes for the rest of the team, Pep buys them and makes them fit.

The other main outfield players Pep has signed all made it clear they wanted to leave the club so that’s totally out of Pep’s hands.

I cant stand these clueless knuckle dragging c@#ts who just repeat what the media tells them.
 
JOGAMIGMOG said:
Just had a look on RAWK.
Torres deal deliberately overpriced to circumvent ffp rules. Barca are seen as a friendly club of City’s.
ADUG apparently investing into ‘non-third-party’ companies who in turn then invest into City.
Then there’s all the usual City bingo stuff. We’re living in their heads and it’s a death by a thousand cuts! :)
Click to expand...
Aren't they on friendly terms with Roma and their board members?

And there were some rumours about them underpaying for Salah and overpaying for Alisson to compensate?
 
JOGAMIGMOG said:
Just had a look on RAWK.
Torres deal deliberately overpriced to circumvent ffp rules. Barca are seen as a friendly club of City’s.
ADUG apparently investing into ‘non-third-party’ companies who in turn then invest into City.
Then there’s all the usual City bingo stuff. We’re living in their heads and it’s a death by a thousand cuts! :)
Click to expand...

Yet they dont mention their shirt sponsor being fined 1.3 billion for money laundering. I dont think any of Citys sponsors have done anything thing illegal
 
JOGAMIGMOG said:
Just had a look on RAWK.
Torres deal deliberately overpriced to circumvent ffp rules. Barca are seen as a friendly club of City’s.
ADUG apparently investing into ‘non-third-party’ companies who in turn then invest into City.
Then there’s all the usual City bingo stuff. We’re living in their heads and it’s a death by a thousand cuts! :)
Click to expand...
At least Torres has a world of potential in front of him, how much did barca pay the dippers for coutinho, £150million or something!!! how did that turn out and where did the money go?

They cannot understand simple business, our owners have made shedloads on the value of the club(well above their investment), and they have taken a return on their money by selling percentages to the chinese and silverlake.

They do not have to take money out every season, they prefer to reinvest to further our progress even more, which is good for us and bad for our oponents.

The bottom line is that anyone buying the likes of dippers or rags will be paying for a club that has peaked in potential investment returns, while us and some others offer far more attractive propositions for financial growth.

I once tried to explain this to a rag friend, but investment/return its not really sport is it he said..........and selling mugs in singapore to people who will never watch you play is!!!!

The only thing they now have is a media backed campaign of negatives to hold against us.
 
They (RAWK and Liverppol fans) don’t understand City’s successful business model apart from Oil money. And even if they did understand City’s business model, they would still accuse City of cheating.

They know fully well City have complied with UEFA and the PL FFP rules for a decade, but they never acknowledge that.(in their constant rants) City’s books are open and transparent, and are inspected on an annual basis by UEFA and the PL. Our yearly accounts are audited by an outside and independent accounting firm and made public.

Considering all of the above and more, where do these Liverpool fans think City are illegally getting the money/revenue from?
 
jrb said:
They (RAWK and Liverppol fans) don’t understand City’s successful business model apart from Oil money. And even if they did understand City’d business model, they would still accuse City of cheating.

They know fully well City have complied with UEFA and the PL FFP rules for a decade, but they never acknowledge that.( in their constant rants) City’s books are open and transparent, and are inspected on an annual basis by UEFA and the PL. Our yearly accounts are done by an outside and independent accounting firm and made public.

Considering all of the above and more, where do these Liverpool fans think City are illegally getting the money/revenue from?
Click to expand...
They think the club buys the seats that aren’t filled on match day and declare it as income, which would account for about 0.5% of our overall turnover at best. Seems completely worth it given the hassle of cleaning that amount of money from a ridiculous number of sources. It’s actually insane that someone actually thinks that would even be worth the hassle, irrespective of the character of our owner. Genuinely nuts.
 
jrb said:
Thankfully for you Adrian, 'Massive LFC fan', you won't have to worry about City in 15-20 years time. YNWA, Adrian.

View attachment 33053

Irishman living in Sydney. Massive LFC fan.

Welcome to the world of Man City - owned by a country of unlimited resources. No team can replace a £50m defender who flops with a shiny new £60m defender, but they can. Hard to see how this changes in next 15 or 20 years

Click to expand...

How thick are these cunts?

LiVeRpOoL eArN mOrE mOnEy ThAn CiTy So CaN sPeNd MoRe MoNeY tHaN cItY iF tHeY aCtUaLlY wAnTeD tO iNvEsT iN tHeIr SqUaD iNsTeAd Of JuSt LiNiNg ThEiR oWnEr’S pOcKeTs

…BUT THEY DON’T INVEST IT IN THEIR SQUAD LIKE CITY DO OUR REVENUE!

Yet they just moan about City instead of moaning at their owner.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top