SouthStandStander
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 31 Jul 2009
- Messages
- 2,477
Is it wrong to be praying for a "24 hours in police custody" episode on him squirm?
I've been wondering about this myself. I'm guessing that all clubs get complaints directed at various players all the time (both authentic & false accusations), at what point do the clubs take them seriously? Mendy for instance was interviewed and released, so the club let him continue (this is presuming they even knew although I'd be surprised if they didn't). The police themselves didn't press it any further at that time (unless they were still collecting evidence?).Given the evidence in the public domain, I don't think they have a choice.
In Mendy's case I believe (and I may be wrong) that someone had made an allegation to the police and that he'd been interviewed under caution and that was as far as it had gone. If that was the case then the club can only go off the players version of events until the police either formally arrest them or satisfactorily conclude their enquiries.
Things said when on England duty. Phil was no angel in Iceland.
Perhaps a bit of debate etiquette/anger management is in order here lad. I've been a Blue since you were still sperm. Didn't realize that I needed your permission to enjoy the " best in all the land and all the WORLD" Fuck off, indeed.So fuck off and watch your rounders or rugby for fannies and stop watching England’s best football team.
Is it wrong to be praying for a "24 hours in police custody" episode on him squirm?
A few months back was not the first time.So something might have been said years back about something that happened a few months back?
I‘m not sure you’ve thought this through.
I doubt they will be questioning many of Greenwood’s club or country teammates as they will have nothing to say on what is happening now.
Are you honestly suggesting that Greenwood confided in Foden about his <alleged> raping and battery of his girlfriend?A few months back was not the first time.
He won’t be squirming. He’ll be lay there cocky, arrogant, grunting answers.Is it wrong to be praying for a "24 hours in police custody" episode on him squirm?
Does anyone else remember that BBC police show on organised crime based in Manchester that was getting loads of rave reviews and then mysteriously got pulled after 2 episodes?
What happened to that?
Got pulled as the remaining cases in the series remained open.Does anyone else remember that BBC police show on organised crime based in Manchester that was getting loads of rave reviews and then mysteriously got pulled after 2 episodes?
What happened to that?
He will be at the ''bitch ruined my life stage'' to be followed by a spell of whining self pity...after the cell door slams it will be tears and bargaining with god.He won’t be squirming. He’ll be lay there cocky, arrogant, grunting answers.
Got pulled as the remaining cases in the series remained open.
They reckon there will be another series, plus the airing of the final 3 shows of the last series at some point soon.
You’d assume so. I can only think that appeals went in?You'd think they'd check that before announcing a 5 part series was airing wouldn't you?
I suspect the opposite is true. He'll have had his every whim pandered to since he broke into their youth setup, and he wouldn't have wanted for anything.He won’t be squirming. He’ll be lay there cocky, arrogant, grunting answers.
My mate had an abusive Father, it was on an occasional basis he gave his wife a slap.Lets be clear , domestic violence is committed by men , mostly, on women across all the demographics , rich and dirt poor , strong women and weak women are victims
I dont know enough about women on men but i suspect it is also as above
Saying why is he risking all he has is not the point , if you wanna rape and beat partners up then you do , you are just that sort of **** regardless if you are rich or poor
Absolutely agree. I'm not saying what he said was right in any way, just thought preventing a backlash from internet warriors could be the only possible explanation for it.I thought that was the only possible generous reading of his comments. Given how women are often treated when they come forward with kind of thing, it's plausible that they might want to get the information out there but then make it look like it wasn't them who released the info or approached the police. Even if that's the case here though, some of the wording he's used and the way in which he sounds almost sympathetic towards Greenwood, doesn't sit very well.