Media Thread - 2021/22

Status
Not open for further replies.
Evra has never recovered from his humiliation in his first game against City.

Evra's a typical rag liar. I remember when he was playing at Juve and was interviewed ahead of a Manchester derby, he insisted that not only he but also his teammate Carlos Tevez would be rooting for United in the forthcoming game. In fact, Tevez has made clear on a number of occasions since leaving us that he prefers City. Says it all about Evra's archetypal United arrogance - but without the self-awareness to understand that, these days, he's got nothing to back it up with.
 
Wonder when there will be an honest verdict regarding Heysel?
Will there be a minutes silence against Madrid?
The anniversary of the Heysel Stadium disaster is the day after the Champions League final so obviously the will be a minutes silence to commemorate it. Especially as it affected one of the clubs involved. Just like at the FA Cup semi final
 
Two players from Dortmund move to the same conurbation, less than 12 months apart. Reported by the same journalist in the same paper…

View attachment 42714View attachment 42716
So for Sancho £77m meaning the transfer fee, for Haaland £213m is the equivalent transfer fee, or does include any made up bollucks figure these idiots can come up with?

Wonder how Alfie's boy will compare with Sancho, Maguire, van dyck to say nothing of pr37 and poggy!?!
 
It's a really good piece that.
F365 can be a bit inconsistent from writer to writer, but they really loathe two-faced journalism.

It's good that someone is finally bringing it up, but the article is internally inconsistent as if they can see it but don't want to believe it.

The headline says it "helps prove" the bias point and the article says it is "peculiar" this only happens to one club, but they themselves don't "give much credence" to the bias argument.

So which is it? A cabal of journalists who dress up City's and only City's transfers in as expensive a light as possible to show them negatively? Or ... well, what exactly? How do they explain it otherwise if they don't think it is bias?

Maybe I am being too hard on them and should be grateful they are at least recognising the bias, no, sorry, the effect of "preference, or the club involved". Not bias, though. Hell, no.
 
Well done Pep on stating the bleeding obvious about the media bias towards Liverpool.

It’s also shone a much needed light on the snide amateurish coverage that our club has suffered for too long as these sycophants try and please their Liverpool/ United loving customers.

The pathetic justifications and some of the other lackeys suddenly going mute makes it even better.
 
Well done Pep on stating the bleeding obvious about the media bias towards Liverpool.

It’s also shone a much needed light on the snide amateurish coverage that our club has suffered for too long as these sycophants try and please their Liverpool/ United loving customers.

The pathetic justifications and some of the other lackeys suddenly going mute makes it even better.
... and those who have commented, generally have reinforced the truth in what Pep said.
 
It's good that someone is finally bringing it up, but the article is internally inconsistent as if they can see it but don't want to believe it.

The headline says it "helps prove" the bias point and the article says it is "peculiar" this only happens to one club, but they themselves don't "give much credence" to the bias argument.

So which is it? A cabal of journalists who dress up City's and only City's transfers in as expensive a light as possible to show them negatively? Or ... well, what exactly? How do they explain it otherwise if they don't think it is bias?

Maybe I am being too hard on them and should be grateful they are at least recognising the bias, no, sorry, the effect of "preference, or the club involved". Not bias, though. Hell, no.
It's a start
 
Two players from Dortmund move to the same conurbation, less than 12 months apart. Reported by the same journalist in the same paper…

View attachment 42714View attachment 42716
I've just pulled James Ducker up on that piece by name in the comments section of the Haarland article in the Daily Telegraph. Let's see if he responds? What Pep has done by calling the media out is excellent. Even other none City fans are now making comments and asking why are we reported on so differently? As you have pointed out in this article and also the article by Luke Edwards on the quadruple in the Telegraph clearly demonstrates blatant anti City bias which is now simply undeniable.
 
It's good that someone is finally bringing it up, but the article is internally inconsistent as if they can see it but don't want to believe it.

The headline says it "helps prove" the bias point and the article says it is "peculiar" this only happens to one club, but they themselves don't "give much credence" to the bias argument.

So which is it? A cabal of journalists who dress up City's and only City's transfers in as expensive a light as possible to show them negatively? Or ... well, what exactly? How do they explain it otherwise if they don't think it is bias?

Maybe I am being too hard on them and should be grateful they are at least recognising the bias, no, sorry, the effect of "preference, or the club involved". Not bias, though. Hell, no.

It is a page to take the mick out of the crap media, and doesn't really intend to do anything that point out double-standards or out and out tosh.
Collymore and Custis are favourite targets.

On the transfer fee quoting with/without wages, I don't think it is just City, but it is clearly only for certain clubs where City are one of those clubs.
Or more accurately, who those clubs are not (wear red, play in the NW, aren't Crewe or Accrington).
 
The anniversary of the Heysel Stadium disaster is the day after the Champions League final so obviously the will be a minutes silence to commemorate it. Especially as it affected one of the clubs involved. Just like at the FA Cup semi final
The silence on Heysel will be deafening.
 
The mickeys really believe they're doing things ''the right way''. I simply point out the cost of their last cl final squad. There is no come back from that.
Of course they do things the right way. Getting players to go on strike and conducting dodgy deals with related clubs. Every club should do that instead of paying a fair whack and agreeing transfers with the selling club.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top