Media Thread - 2021/22

[petrusha]

Evra has never recovered from his humiliation in his first game against City.

Evra's a typical rag liar. I remember when he was playing at Juve and was interviewed ahead of a Manchester derby, he insisted that not only he but also his teammate Carlos Tevez would be rooting for United in the forthcoming game. In fact, Tevez has made clear on a number of occasions since leaving us that he prefers City. Says it all about Evra's archetypal United arrogance - but without the self-awareness to understand that, these days, he's got nothing to back it up with.

 

[Gingers Dad]

Wonder when there will be an honest verdict regarding Heysel?
Will there be a minutes silence against Madrid?

The anniversary of the Heysel Stadium disaster is the day after the Champions League final so obviously the will be a minutes silence to commemorate it. Especially as it affected one of the clubs involved. Just like at the FA Cup semi final

 

[Aba452]

Two players from Dortmund move to the same conurbation, less than 12 months apart. Reported by the same journalist in the same paper…

View attachment 42714View attachment 42716

So for Sancho £77m meaning the transfer fee, for Haaland £213m is the equivalent transfer fee, or does include any made up bollucks figure these idiots can come up with?

Wonder how Alfie's boy will compare with Sancho, Maguire, van dyck to say nothing of pr37 and poggy!?!

 

[pudge]

Danny Murphy says there's no bias towards Liverpool so that's the end of that everyone, stand down

 

[halfcenturyup]

It's a really good piece that.
F365 can be a bit inconsistent from writer to writer, but they really loathe two-faced journalism.

It's good that someone is finally bringing it up, but the article is internally inconsistent as if they can see it but don't want to believe it.

The headline says it "helps prove" the bias point and the article says it is "peculiar" this only happens to one club, but they themselves don't "give much credence" to the bias argument.

So which is it? A cabal of journalists who dress up City's and only City's transfers in as expensive a light as possible to show them negatively? Or ... well, what exactly? How do they explain it otherwise if they don't think it is bias?

Maybe I am being too hard on them and should be grateful they are at least recognising the bias, no, sorry, the effect of "preference, or the club involved". Not bias, though. Hell, no.

 

[Bluearmy]

Two players from Dortmund move to the same conurbation, less than 12 months apart. Reported by the same journalist in the same paper…

View attachment 42714View attachment 42716

Same paper, same journalist, 2 different clubs…. Spot the difference. No agenda tho

 

[Revolver]

Well done Pep on stating the bleeding obvious about the media bias towards Liverpool.

It’s also shone a much needed light on the snide amateurish coverage that our club has suffered for too long as these sycophants try and please their Liverpool/ United loving customers.

The pathetic justifications and some of the other lackeys suddenly going mute makes it even better.

 

[Gingers Dad]

Two players from Dortmund move to the same conurbation, less than 12 months apart. Reported by the same journalist in the same paper…

View attachment 42714View attachment 42716

Everyone knows Sancho plays at OT for the love of it, doesn't take a wage.

 

[Bluearmy]

Danny Murphy says there's no bias towards Liverpool so that's the end of that everyone, stand down

Took him a whole 30 seconds to make himslef look a clown

 

[spiny]

Well done Pep on stating the bleeding obvious about the media bias towards Liverpool.

It’s also shone a much needed light on the snide amateurish coverage that our club has suffered for too long as these sycophants try and please their Liverpool/ United loving customers.

The pathetic justifications and some of the other lackeys suddenly going mute makes it even better.

... and those who have commented, generally have reinforced the truth in what Pep said.