blueparrot
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Jun 2012
- Messages
- 33,407
I do.And yet nobody calls him a bargain either…
I do.And yet nobody calls him a bargain either…
I hope you aren’t a financial advisor.I do.
Can PSG not afford him then , I wouldn't be advising someone on minimum wage to buy him, wouldn't be a bargain then. The fact that they could sell him for a profit makes him a bargain.I hope you aren’t a financial advisor.
Sure. He’s not won anything for them that they wouldn’t have won, so his outlay could be seen as vastly over his worth to their team.Can PSG not afford him then , I wouldn't be advising someone on minimum wage to buy him, wouldn't be a bargain then. The fact that they could sell him for a profit makes him a bargain.
You brought mbappe into the conversation with your false post that mbappe cost less than £130m.And yet nobody calls him a bargain either…
I genuinely think sancho is not intelligent (football or otherwise) enough to play for a team thats not on a continual counter attack. Think he’d struggle here now and even if he’s stayed.Sancho would’ve made it if he’d come to us. It’s the rags graveyard effect that’s caused his decline. When was the last time the rags signed a decent player and they improved, or even remained at the same level?
For me Grealish is 100% a better player now than when we bought him. Everyones favourite punchbag but a quality playerPep cannot work miracles. Some players he develops but others it doesn't work . Is Mahrez better now than when he joined, is Grealish did Sterling and Jesus fully realise their potential? ..
Hes not at Birmingham, hes at Dortmund. So if it costs 130m, thats what it costs.Not at 130m plus contract, no.
Pick him up from Birmingham for 25m, he is the steal of the century.
Football is a business end of story.Hes not at Birmingham, hes at Dortmund. So if it costs 130m, thats what it costs.
Why is anyone arsed, not like they are doing a whip around on this forum to pay for the lad.
Make it 200m, then maybe 150m on Gavi and 300m on Gvardiol just to round off the summer. This idea of any sort of value for money rating in football transfers is absurd.
I think Pep making players better relates to how they function on a higher level in our structure. They fit the collective therefore shine. That to me is Peps strength.I genuinely think sancho is not intelligent (football or otherwise) enough to play for a team thats not on a continual counter attack. Think he’d struggle here now and even if he’s stayed.
For me Grealish is 100% a better player now than when we bought him. Everyones favourite punchbag but a quality player
Mahrez was better last 2 seasons than the player we bought yes. Less explosive than leicester title season but working under much higher pressure. Had a poor start to this season but current level isnt representative
Sterling definitely realised his potential! Christ do you think he could have been any better than the 17/18,18/19 seasons? Poor last season
Jesus will struggle to be better than he was for us, could still improve but no one thought he was being held back.
All 4 improved under pep. If bellingham came in and also improved under pep we’d be onto an incredible midfield player.
See also bernardo, rodri, gundo, kdb - all “good” players made “great” by pep
It isn't our business though, If you think the club are reckless or negligent and not to be trusted with the money then It may something to be concerned about. I don't I think they are sensible and highly competent so the cost of the players we buy are of no concern to me.Football is a business end of story.
100m plus transfers have to succeed , even for huge cash rich business's.
What a strange question?Would you have Bellingham or Rhodri?
We may buy him but he comes with the usual English tax and expectation
In horse racing terms people pay absolute fortunes for horses because of breeding or in simpler terms potential.Is Jude a complete midfield player at this time?
List all the deals over 120m that are failures, you keep mentioning that many fail.Obviously, but history shows these huge deals often fail.
As far as I am aware horse racing has not limit on investment and is called the sport of kings for a reason.In horse racing terms people pay absolute fortunes for horses because of breeding or in simpler terms potential.
Bellingham is a full international at 18yo, scored at a world cup finals and has the 'potential' to improve and keep on improving.
We signed Sterling for 45m and then we got the best three years out of him anybody will get.
At 18yo we could feasibly have this player for 15 years for 130m that would make it an absolute bargain.
So we are not allowed to discuss transfer fees now?Advice to those whose knockers are badly twisted......ignore the price,as its irrelevant,and concentrate your focus solely on the player and his footballing ability......you'll feel much better.
Not at 130m plus contract, no.
Pick him up from Birmingham for 25m, he is the steal of the century.