VAR thread 2022/23

[decmancity]

It’s not gone to plan though has it?

Since Leicester won the title

Man City have won it 5 times , Liverpool and Chelsea once

I fancy City still this season , can’t see Arsenal maintaining their form

I don't think even the premier league can make the rags capable of a title challenge in the past decade. That changes now of course.

 

[bondsman]

Not sure about haaland but casemiro on cancelo in the box was from behind...how can you tackle from behind in the box ( and not play the ball but the man)....how?

This. Stonewall pen

 

[HypnoticBlue]

Football is bent, the end.

 

[Dirty Harry]

As per my post, Agreed it was offside

Saying “kind of “ at the end isn’t really agreeing.

As for the poll, I voted yes, on the grounds I think it should be open and transparent, although after today, I’m not sure it would make too much difference to the decisions made at the time, it’ll just make them more accountable afterwards.

 

[Newman Noggs]

Hmmm. The Wolves goal at Anfield was disallowed due to an "over eager" ITV cameraman according to the Mail;

" ITV sources insisted it was common practice for match directors to request that the 18-yard camera zoom in at corners to capture any infringements in the penalty area, such as shirt pulling"

I wonder how many match directors at Sky dictate what their cameramen focus on.

 

[Chipmeister]

I would just like to ask one question
If Rashford had stopped running because he was offside would Fernandes have got to the ball to have his shot.

Yes or No

 

[Bluearmy]

I would just like to ask one question
If Rashford had stopped running because he was offside would Fernandes have got to the ball to have his shot.

Yes or No

No

 

[SamTheGuru]

I am sorry but I cannot fucking take this.

This is how the rule is supposed to be exploited (apologies for music but it was the first clip I could find):



Not 27 stepovers and blocking the ball whilst defenders are farming you in waiting for offside.

 

[Bantamgaz]

As soon as Rashford goes towards that ball he becomes active but hey that would get in the way of trying to get United back to the top again

 

[Chipmeister]

No

Is the answer therefore Rashford had an effect of the play even without touching the ball.
OFFSIDE by the laws of the game

 

[BlueHammer85]

Saying “kind of “ at the end isn’t really agreeing.

Didn’t mention ‘kind of’ when it come to the offside decision

One million % that should have been given offside

 

[Dirty Harry]

Didn’t mention ‘kind of’ when it come to the offside decision

One million % that should have been given offside

This is what you put :-

that should of been offside today for me- Rashford was impeding kind off -

Unless you’re now saying the second part has nothing to do with the first part ?

 

[BlueHammer85]

This is what you put :-


Unless you’re now saying the second part has nothing to do with the first part ?

Can twist it how you want, I clearly stated I thought it was offside as Rashford is impeding kind of - to elaborate no physical contact but still impeding

1 billion trillion gazillion % should have been offside (I get some want me to argue it shouldn’t have been just so they can vent)

 

[Dirty Harry]

Can twist it how you want, I clearly stated I thought it was offside as Rashford is impeding kind of - to elaborate no physical contact but still impeding

1 billion trillion gazillion % should have been offside (I get some want me to argue it shouldn’t have been just so they can vent)

Not twisting or venting anything mate, if I was trying to twist it, I’d have omitted the first part, if I was venting, I’d have called you wumming twat ;-)

that should of been offside today for me- Rashford was impeding kind off -

As I said, putting ‘kind of’ after it isn’t agreeing.

 

[BlueHammer85]

Not twisting or venting anything mate, if I was trying to twist it, I’d have omitted the first part, if I was venting, I’d have called you wumming twat ;-)

As I said, putting ‘kind of’ after it isn’t agreeing.

Ok but I’m not putting kind of’ after saying it was offside

I put kind of’ too the fact Rashford was impeding as the ref would argue he wasn’t physically impeding- but he still is kind of as Akanji was playing him off and Ederson would of got there. Hope that clarifies.

It should have been offside. No argument. The refs a twat to overrule

 

[Dirty Harry]

Ok but I’m not putting kind of’ after saying it was offside

I put kind of’ too the fact Rashford was impeding as the ref would argue he wasn’t physically impeding- but he still is kind of as Akanji was playing him off and Ederson would of got there. Hope that clarifies.

It should have been offside. No argument. The refs a twat to overrule

Sorry mate but if you think he was offside and that Rashford was impeding, there’s no ‘kind of’ about it, he was simply offside .

 

[Bill the Blue]

Can twist it how you want, I clearly stated I thought it was offside as Rashford is impeding kind of - to elaborate no physical contact but still impeding

1 billion trillion gazillion % should have been offside (I get some want me to argue it shouldn’t have been just so they can vent)

1 billion trillion gazillion % ..

FFS, how old are you ?

Looks like you've been rumbled once again as being a bit of a wum.

Just seen your updated post, squirming like fcuk again trying to get yourself off the hook..!

Lol..!

 

[BlueHammer85]

Sorry mate but if you think he was offside and that Rashford was impeding, there’s no ‘kind of’ about it, he was simply offside .

it should have been offside. No argument.

 

[BlueHammer85]

1 billion trillion gazillion % ..

FFS, how old are you ?

Looks like you've been rumbled once again as being a bit of a wum.

Just seen your updated post, squirming like fcuk again trying to get yourself off the hook..!

Lol..!

‘’Lol’’ - how old are you ?

Morning angry man

Nope, no debate on this offside from me unfortunately for you.

It was offside. No argument.

Have a nice day

 

[Bantamgaz]

It’s not even bias towards your own team even outsiders can see how bent it was

Let’s be right the offside law is a joke and has been for years ........ I don’t give a Fook of your not interfering with play as soon as that balls played forward and your on an offside position then your offside .......... how many decades did it work for and nobody moaned about it ???
At least we all knew what the law was but fooking that yesterday was the worse of the worse ......... how can he possibly not be interfering with play when the defenders and keeper have reacted to him ???????
I seriously just give up on it now it’s just all about keeping certain clubs on top not about sport at all any more ........... and any lurking Newcastle fans on here welcome to your future this is what awaits you