Kyle Walker newspaper story

I agree, however, I hope the **** who sold the video to the sun loses there job. I’d imagine if KW wanted to pursue it he would have grounds to take owners of the establishment to the cleaners.

If it was an employee or CCTV owned by the establishment then they are governed by gdpr legislation.
 
It's not a double standard.

Drinking to excess, affecting your training or performances, is unprofessional and bad for your career. When Jack and Phil did it they were rightly reprimanded by the manager and as far as we know it's never happened again. They were both old enough to surely not have needed that lesson, but it is what it is, they had the lesson and fingers crossed it's stuck.

Exposing your penis in a public place is a crime.

If we're going on paper reports Jack and Phil were allegedly reprimanded for turning up either still half cut or so hungover they couldn't function.

Walker seems to have arrived on time and ready to work.
 
Sharing the CCTV video without permission of the individuals involved to a national newspaper or anyone other than law enforcement ( and they have to have good reason) is illegal. The bar and newspaper have broken GDPR. Why share something like this? I really can't believe the owners or manager of the club has. This has to be some idiot who works there and wants to make some quick cash. I guess they have already been sacked and Walkers lawyers have made a complaint regarding the data breach. The bar could be heavily fined. If Kyle has broken the law then CPS will review any evidence the Police collect (if they are involved) and then decide to procescute. We all have to let our hair down and need to relax. Sometimes we go to far. What we don't need is the clubs and bars we are in breaking the law.
 
The same Kyle Walker who was a decent pundit on the Sheffield Untied footy game recently may find punditry drying up soon. Allegations can cripple. If revealed as fact, let the punishment merit the action. No need for it.
 
I'm not 100%, but what would the counter argument be? Why would they not be allowed to record their own CCTV and do with it what they please? Being a pro footballer isn't any kind of protection in its own right.
I just don't think in law, that places can just send in CCTV footage to anyone to make a few quid.

EDIT: See post above from @kippax_blueboy
 
The same Kyle Walker who was a decent pundit on the Sheffield Untied footy game recently may find punditry drying up soon. Allegations can cripple. If revealed as fact, let the punishment merit the action. No need for it.

One of the guys presenting for Sky every week got filmed gozzing all over a bloke and his little daughter.

This isn't going to "cripple" him.
 
I hope he's not involved in a VAR offside decision tonight.
Imagine drawing the offside lines and trying to judge what part of his body is on or offside.
 
Sharing the CCTV video without permission of the individuals involved to a national newspaper or anyone other than law enforcement ( and they have to have good reason) is illegal. The bar and newspaper have broken GDPR. Why share something like this? I really can't believe the owners or manager of the club has. This has to be some idiot who works there and wants to make some quick cash. I guess they have already been sacked and Walkers lawyers have made a complaint regarding the data breach. The bar could be heavily fined. If Kyle has broken the law then CPS will review any evidence the Police collect (if they are involved) and then decide to procescute. We all have to let our hair down and need to relax. Sometimes we go to far. What we don't need is the clubs and bars we are in breaking the law.

I don’t know the law but I imagine it’s not unconnected to legal matters why they don’t actually name the bar. Or why they have the ridiculous images of a bloke with his face pixilated but named in the accompanying caption.
 
Whether or not you can function for work is not the only measure of whether your extracurricular activities impact your job.

It might impact in the long term but it's obviously not had much of an impact on the last 15 years of his career, otherwise we wouldn't have signed the bloke and he wouldn't have fought off the likes of Cancelo and Danilo to keep his place since he got here.

And indecent exposure is not funny, or harmless, or victimless.

Who were the victims in this instance?
 
Whether or not you can function for work is not the only measure of whether your extracurricular activities impact your job.

And do you know who's in a position to judge that? Pep Guardiola and the heirarchy at Manchester City.

And they seem to think it's not impacted his performance.
 
You never see a pap at the Trafford Centre because no fucker of any interest in their right mind would go there. But are you saying the bar can’t just hand over footage as that’s illegal but it’s ok to sell it?

It's private property, whether it be the Trafford Centre or inside Harvey Nicks.

The bar own the rights, don't think it matters whether payment was received or not.

The bar may have broken privacy laws if it was them, however.

Usually a disgruntled security guard who saw a chance to make a few quid.
 
It's private property, whether it be the Trafford Centre or inside Harvey Nicks.

The bar own the rights, don't think it matters whether payment was received or not.

The bar may have broken privacy laws if it was them, however.

Usually a disgruntled security guard who saw a chance to make a few quid.

GDPR wise the bar is responsible, even if they didn’t get paid.

You own the CCTV, you’re responsible for avoiding any privacy breaches.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top