His attitude towards officials is a disgrace.
Bias*ed*. He's not 'being bias', he's 'being biased'Klopp doesn’t want to blow Tierneys cover so calls him out at being bias because Everytime I see Tierney referee then he so lenient towards Liverpool..
The semi-colon was unnecessary, a comma would have been satisfactory.Bias*ed*. He's not 'being bias', he's 'being biased'
Bias is the thing; biased is what a person is. It works the same way as 'hunger' & 'hungry'...the thing is hunger, and a person is hungry.
You're welcome ;)
Wrong; it's being used legitimately as a coordinating conjunction. But you knew that ;)The semi-colon was unnecessary, a comma would have been satisfactory.
He's gone full Scouse.He’s got mental issues hasn’t he
Think Paul Tierney was the ref for the City Everton game last season when we had the Rodri handball incident. May have something to do with that.Klopp doesn’t want to blow Tierneys cover so calls him out at being bias because Everytime I see Tierney referee then he so lenient towards Liverpool..
How that wasn’t a penalty is staggering.Agreed.
Jota should have been sent off and argument for a Spurs penalty at 3-2 when Richarlison was pulled back.
It was never handball by RodriThink Paul Tierney was the ref for the City Everton game last season when we had the Rodri handball incident. May have something to do with that.
Ha ha Bingo is a tool.Klopp has called the referee Tierney bias and says he has something against him personally which influences his ability to referee Liverpool fairly.
I think maybe this time even the fa can't ignore his spiteful words.
Bias*ed*. He's not 'being bias', he's 'being biased'
Bias is the thing; biased is what a person is. It works the same way as 'hunger' & 'hungry'...the thing is hunger, and a person is hungry.
You're welcome ;)
*knewBottom line you new what I meant[emoji16] keep up the good work
Think Paul Tierney was the ref for the City Everton game last season when we had the Rodri handball incident. May have something to do with that.
I agree with this!I’ve seen the still footage of that from behind the goal wasn’t hand ball hit his shoulder! All the photos that we see the ball hasn’t actual hit his shoulder yet the ball still had at least 6 inches from touching him the ball was moving upwards too..
No interpretation required.
Wrong; it's being used legitimately as a coordinating conjunction. But you knew that ;)