Media Discussion - 2023/24

Status
Not open for further replies.
Rory Bluelow said:
IF he’s real (which I’d seriously doubt) he needs to stop pretending to be a blue and fuck off somewhere else. Maybe follow rugby or something. How can you experience the pure joy and emotion of achieving the best treble ever - after all the negative shit slung at us - and see it that way.
Me and my sons (and all my City supporting pals) have not stopped grinning since…fallen out of love with club my arse !
Click to expand...
He also mentioned the EPL charges all of which preceded Peps arrival and the UEFA charges which we were found not guilty of. No blue would play City bingo like this, god knows where they dug him up from the only other blue I've heard talking like this is Colin Schindler. As for me I did the hard yards in the eighties, nineties and to a lesser extent the noughties and can only say Istanbul and Wembley where the greatest moment of my life ( at least sports wise) whatever the future holds will dine out on it for the rest of my life. Loved the eighties and nineties but no I didn't want to stay shit forever, polish our halos and see United win everything, every club in the country want what we have and can't believe any blue is not enjoying it. If it's upsetting him that much he can come to my other club Fleetwood town and witness what happens when the owners pack it in.
 
Tony Curran has done a couple of book reviews for WSC, Paul Lake’s autobiography and one on City’s struggles in the nineties. WSC usually commission their articles so I’m guessing they picked up on his luke warm support and asked him to write about it.
 
I see the bbc headline refers to “ambitious arsenal”. That’s the team whose net spend over the last 5 years is more than £200m higher than ours, and are about to be a further £140m ahead of us this summer. Not referred to as moneybags, filthy rich, financially doped etc, they are “ambitious”. Media cunts
 
Rory Bluelow said:
The cameras picked out a few sad bastards wearing Rag shirts at Glastonbury…I mean why, just why, would you do that. Having said that they were ugly fuckers and seemed to have no mates. They didn’t have any girls with great tits sat on their shoulders or anything. In fact the women who anywhere near them seemed to be either plug ugly with no tits or generally heifers/bovines.
Support the rags…be a loser.
Click to expand...
Have you ever won any awards for your political correctness lol?
 
Rory Bluelow said:
The cameras picked out a few sad bastards wearing Rag shirts at Glastonbury…I mean why, just why, would you do that. Having said that they were ugly fuckers and seemed to have no mates. They didn’t have any girls with great tits sat on their shoulders or anything. In fact the women who anywhere near them seemed to be either plug ugly with no tits or generally heifers/bovines.
Support the rags…be a loser.
Click to expand...
I really must protest at that post. Shameful.

There is nothing wrong with a lovely heifer.
 
laserblue said:
I too subscribed to WSC for about 30 years but cancelled my subscription earlier this year after a string of articles full of City Bingo bullshit. I told them my reasons too but without response. My last copy before my subscription ended was the March issue and I chucked it away without reading it.
Click to expand...
I cancelled WSC 18 months ago for the same reason. It had turned into an anti-City Ragvertising Leaflet.
 
It's not just the blue of City that gets done over by their red shirted counterparts by the BBC's biased sports media crew. It's as though they can only type the words United and Liverpool...

1688047736286.png
 
BringBackSwales said:
I see the bbc headline refers to “ambitious arsenal”. That’s the team whose net spend over the last 5 years is more than £200m higher than ours, and are about to be a further £140m ahead of us this summer. Not referred to as moneybags, filthy rich, financially doped etc, they are “ambitious”. Media cunts
Click to expand...
Don’t forget sponsored by the emirates.
 
Spurs quarter 69 said:
I have been an avid reader of WSC for around 30 years, principally attracted by the fact it was not a United wank mag. I was somewhat irritated that post Hillsborough they gave dipper fans a free pass but so did all the press. Today may be the last time I buy it, the coverage of our treble consisted of an article by a supposed City fan called Tony Curran. Tony if he exists has fallen out of love with the club but can't quite let go. His view of the treble," Arsenal were demoralised by defeat at the Etihad and gifted City the title." " United were passive in the final nearly snatched a late equaliser, and we would not have fancied extra time". " The champions league final was a cagey affair won with a gritty defensive performance, a team running on fumes were fortunate to meet opponents who only stretched them in the very final stages". Well Tony with friends like you who needs rags and dippers. Both United and Inter played as well as they were let, did you miss the host of missed chances and the farcical refereeing in the cup final. The CL final was a meeting of the two top teams in Europe always going to be a game of fine margins, did you forget we put out Real and Bayern on the way. Of course we were running on fumes the treble is f*****g hard that's why it's only been won twice by an English club. Either support us with joy or stop supporting us and please don't write carping articles that will only give comfort to our many detractors.
Click to expand...

That WSC article was truly awful, but it's only the latest in long line of hatchet jobs.

WSC rarely feature anything on City, but when they do it's always the same.

I won't be buying it again.
 
It's a disgrace the way City are treated by the authorities. It's really quite a simple reason, pure jealousy. Remember most of them belong to rival clubs.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top