Jesus H Gabz
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 14 Nov 2019
- Messages
- 5,147
- Team supported
- City
I look at the etisalat deal as Khaldoon setting off a little wind up mouse for the press & authorities to chase around while we go about our business
They have to prove them, although the burden of proof will be lower than in a criminal court.The PL will have to provide evidence to support their allegations. They can't just pluck them out of thin air. They are serious allegations.
No, I’m the shadowy figure from The UAE who gave City 30 million.I’m the shadowy figure from The UAE who gave city 30 million.
They’ll probably produce the cut and pasted e-mails that uefa used at CAS ;-)They have to prove them, although the burden of proof will be lower than in a criminal court.
They have to prove them, although the burden of proof will be lower than in a criminal court.
If they're essential saying we committed accounting fraud isn't that burden higher?
Someone should take a hit out on him!?Or publishing fake photographs on the front of the Mirror slating The Queen's Lancashire Regiment? Fucking bullshitting idiot.
Thanks, that's exactly my interruption.If I've picked up ProjectRiver and others on this correctly, and apologies if I'm misquoting, the burden of proof is lower in a panel than a court (balance of probabilities Vs beyond reasonable doubt) BUT in allegations of false accounting the cogency of evidence required to reach that balance of probability must be stronger.
They do have form/previous. Were they not once the laughing stock over the "Hitler Diaries"It is strange. I don't know why the Times would want to be associated with such a weak and poorly-sourced story. I can only assume that Matt Lawton is stupid or has questionable motives. You do wonder about the quality control on the Times Sportsdesk. It wouldn't take long to find the earlier story on Google. Perhaps it was just incompetence.