PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

I look at the etisalat deal as Khaldoon setting off a little wind up mouse for the press & authorities to chase around while we go about our business
 
Ultimately it seems they want to charge us with something and make sure whatever it is some or a lot of those charges stand. Just depends on what the consequences are.
 
It’s bizarre it’s made out to be a pre-determined consequence and we’re made to understand charges one by one lol
 
Arsenal agree fee with WHU for a record fee for a british player, rags agree fee for Mount, and "new allegations against state owned City" and dragging us through the mud for the millionth time.

just a short summary of today sport news.

also on a different level the media fawning over Arteta, even crediting him of a great job by spending 100s of millions on signings and rebuilding Arsenal while winning nothing, while giving Pep zero credit for success and football created this country hasnt seen before shows us everything we need to know of media bias and racism.
 
Drip feeding details of items already under investigation is as subtle as the old phone tapping caper that Piers and Co really should have been imprisoned for.
 
If they're essential saying we committed accounting fraud isn't that burden higher?

If I've picked up ProjectRiver and others on this correctly, and apologies if I'm misquoting, the burden of proof is lower in a panel than a court (balance of probabilities Vs beyond reasonable doubt) BUT in allegations of false accounting the cogency of evidence required to reach that balance of probability must be stronger.
 
If I've picked up ProjectRiver and others on this correctly, and apologies if I'm misquoting, the burden of proof is lower in a panel than a court (balance of probabilities Vs beyond reasonable doubt) BUT in allegations of false accounting the cogency of evidence required to reach that balance of probability must be stronger.
Thanks, that's exactly my interruption.
 
It is strange. I don't know why the Times would want to be associated with such a weak and poorly-sourced story. I can only assume that Matt Lawton is stupid or has questionable motives. You do wonder about the quality control on the Times Sportsdesk. It wouldn't take long to find the earlier story on Google. Perhaps it was just incompetence.
They do have form/previous. Were they not once the laughing stock over the "Hitler Diaries"
 
Last edited:

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top