Im not sure they haveFair play to them sacking him.
Im not sure they haveFair play to them sacking him.
He wasn't found not guilty. The case collapsed because of witnesses refusing to give evidence in court. Make of that what you will. Either paid off or intimidated.Mason Greenwood to leave Old Trafford
So to wrap things up: 1- We need him (obviously). 2- He was legally proven not guilty. 3- Made peace with his fiancee. BUT the minority mob in power wanted to cancel him, so, we should cancel him. After ronaldo, de gea and him now, I'm getting the impression that a bunch of wankers are...www.redcafe.net
Wow!
Oh I didnt read that about selling him I thought he was sacked !
Has the bottle still got it’s screw cap will add value?Are they still for sale?
I'd like to offer half a mars bar and an empty Corona bottle please.....well if a house isn't sold it ends up at auction.
Slimeball Solhekol reporting on Sky had better shut up before he says something that might be considered as liable.
Step forward Sean DychThey're trying to get a transfer fee, the rancid spineless bastards
Everton or West HamMake a list of GPC's mates/ex players managing clubs and narrow it down.
I'm going for Middlesbrough.
Well he wasn’t convicted so innocent before proven guilty, they can’t really accuse him.If he didnt commit them, why get rid
If it wasnt him, he would be playing for united still. They must think peopleI'm confused.
utd are saying those pictures of that girl injuries wasnt caused by Greenwood.
I might be abit simply but if Greenwood didnt attach the girl who did ? Or did the girl do it to herself, which I dont believe to be true.
At what point does the victim get charged for wasting police time, falsely accusing her boyfriend of GBH and rape and ruining his career at itd ?
I dont understand this, well I guess I do it's clear he did it allegedly
You know the scoreThey were shamed into this decision and now these cunty media guys saying the rags have done the right thing.
Don't think the scousers would have him?Everton or West Ham
Yeah seems ambiguous enough and not "axed after internal investigations". Mutual agreement normally means sacked but they could be selling his contract to Saudi is my guess.They aren't sacking him. Both statements (club & player) are very poor, but at no point is sacking mentioned, just that he will continue his career away from the swamp. The club statement can almost appear sympathetic towards him, in that they are working with him/supporting him in his next career move (probably hoping they can get a transfer fee out of it).
United said in a statement: "All those involved, including Mason, recognise the difficulties with him recommencing his career at Manchester United.
"It has therefore been mutually agreed that it would be most appropriate for him to do so away from Old Trafford, and we will now work with Mason to achieve that outcome."
They are absolutely desperate for someone up front and the thought of being relegated with a brand new stadium must give them sleepless nightsDon't think the scousers would have him?