The seriousness of the PL FFP charges cannot be taken lightly, as highlighted in many previous posts. However, the Manchester City ship sailed years ago with any rationale for FFP disbunked plus similar charges by UEFA found not proven by CAS.
The 115 charges instigated by certain clubs have served their PR purpose and we could see them "time lapsed" should the evidence for proof of guilt be shakey at best.
Rather than talk about financial doping, where the rags, Chelsea and others have failed. City have provided a new model for investment with success and sustainability on and off the field. MCFC now are the top rated, most successful club in Europe if not the world, generating the highest revenue with a sustainable academy and not even the biggest transfer net or spenders in England over the past 5 years.
Old concepts of generating revenue have changed. Interesting how u16's and especially u10's perceive MCFC compared with others and expected success. City's exposure has rocketed with trophies. Jack was a PR coup but Erling the Viking is a world star game changer with shirts with his name now must be the most popular anywhere.
City featured in the top 20 Forbes clubs revenue before the ADUG take over to dispel the small club myth. We have grown from a a big club to massive. The City model is a template for success.
Where does this leave FFP and its rationale?