Liverpool Thread - 2023/24

Status
Not open for further replies.
I can't read his posts as I'm ignoring him, but it seems like (reading the responses) our new little pet scouser has gone down the same route as one of our other little pet scousers (Tom Ford pages 190-195ish of this thread) and pulled out their own "X-factor sob story".

Little tommy from Middlesboro claims Parkinson's.
Little d from darn sarf claims a death in the family.

May or may not be true, but my spider senses are tingling! ;)
Bang on. I have him on ignore as well. Don’t feed the troll. Once again, another sad, pathetic, dickhead, scouse, WUM has been allowed to takeover and derail the thread.
 
Thanks mate
Football based abuse, mockery and everything else anti Liverpool is completely fair game for me being on here as a Liverpool supporting waster, as one gent on here said - if you're a rival fan on here you need to prepare for a rough ride which is completely ok, I get that.

Taking the piss about losing a family member is utterly unbelievable mate. Don't go there.
Wanna buy a mourn little d's great uncle Marvin candle? Fuck me you lot literally claim to be offended by anything.
 
I think it's just the hypocrisy that probably grates people more re Liverpool. I mean Klopp is genuinely a very intelligent manager, has produced two very good sides, Salah probably one of the most exciting and talented forwards in prem history.. (Henry and Drogba better in my opinion). But, and here is the but ..nothing matches up with them. The meeeeja go on about knowledgeable scouse crowd when less than 10% are scouse so that's horse shit. The hacking case (proved guilty), where they had a period of great recruitment - never mentioned that a % of good buys on the back of our excellent scouting work. The fact that they try and ignore their success was built on Moore's gambling money, Shanks demanded big trf pot for a second division club, he got it and bought well - Ian St John British record fee - for a Div 2 side come on!!!. Fair enough buying well (well they had the funds) but to pretend their success was organic is crazy, Meeja never bring this up of course. They also would have failed FFP by miles in today's system. Oh wait a minute, they also have failed FFP as well but training ground development apparently saved them FFS! Again this is never mentioned by their fans or meeja...most fans of other clubs know all this that's why most fans find LFC fans more difficult to have a pint with post-game or chat with in the pub during the week. They pretend it's jealousy when most know it's a characer flaw for many when they choose Liverpool as their team. They are quite unique in not acknowledging their 'istry (we had about as many trophies as them before the gambling money - hardly ever mentioned when they talk about 'istry). I accept City's punishment if proved guilty, that's fair enough but for them to pretend they are different - just grates when it's obvious they aren't.
Not sure if I said, but that's a super interesting post.

I'll take the character flaw on the chin lol. Maybe it's time to devote my time to my local team...

It's one thing I realised quite quickly is that we as a fan base take moral high ground extremely quickly, and with selective memory.

Can't fault any of the above, bang on.

What's that hacking case? Sounds grim.
 
Appreciate that mate. I think football has been a way of keeping my mind busy at times, even if its busy on the wrong team :)

I do joke with my mates that if I started from scratch, supporting any team...it wouldn't be my current one lol! but there we go, I'm diseased now so there's no going back lol.
You have my deepest sympathies mate.My dad passed away young,it leaves a big gap.
 
What's that hacking case? Sounds grim.
And there’s your problem.
You know nothing but the edited biased highlights of your club’s history.

You want to engage, maybe when prompted you actually, lol, ‘do your own research’, a simple google of ‘Liverpool hacking’ will lead you to it.
From a City fan point of view, it’s a security embarrassment and a ‘why did we settle for only £1m from these lowlifes’ ongoing issue.
From a Liverpool fan point of view- get an education on the mounds of negative Liverpool facts deemed generally unnewsworthy by the vast majority of the media, and then begin to realise that the chant ‘always the victims, it’s never your fault’ is absolutely nothing to do with Hillsborough, but everything to do with all the other incidents that are seriously underreported or twisted to have zero Liverpool fan negative connotations .
 
And there’s your problem.
You know nothing but the edited biased highlights of your club’s history.

You want to engage, maybe when prompted you actually, lol, ‘do your own research’, a simple google of ‘Liverpool hacking’ will lead you to it.
From a City fan point of view, it’s a security embarrassment and a ‘why did we settle for only £1m from these lowlifes’ ongoing issue.
From a Liverpool fan point of view- get an education on the mounds of negative Liverpool facts deemed generally unnewsworthy by the vast majority of the media, and then begin to realise that the chant ‘always the victims, it’s never your fault’ is absolutely nothing to do with Hillsborough, but everything to do with all the other incidents that are seriously underreported or twisted to have zero Liverpool fan negative connotations .
What’s that coach bricking episode.. sounds grim!
 
What’s that coach bricking episode.. sounds grim!
Lol, we could be here for another 50 pages , I mean you’ll need to specify which particular coach attack you’re referring to…

So, @b2w you know anything about a City coach attack?
The one with a video inside the coach on the way to the ground, that you can just about count the individual hits, as there are so many?
The one where the coach was deemed unserviceable for the return journey?
The one where the Liverpool fans were videoed climbing onto police vans to assist their aim?
The one where zero Liverpool fans have been charged with any assault or affray despite the mounds of video evidence, including the aforesaid police van climbing?
The one where City should have called off the match, and asked for Liverpool to be banned /severely fined for not controlling their fans or even condemning them in anyway, especially as it wasnt the 1st or last time?
The one you probably think is just ‘banter’?
 
And there’s your problem.
You know nothing but the edited biased highlights of your club’s history.

You want to engage, maybe when prompted you actually, lol, ‘do your own research’, a simple google of ‘Liverpool hacking’ will lead you to it.
From a City fan point of view, it’s a security embarrassment and a ‘why did we settle for only £1m from these lowlifes’ ongoing issue.
From a Liverpool fan point of view- get an education on the mounds of negative Liverpool facts deemed generally unnewsworthy by the vast majority of the media, and then begin to realise that the chant ‘always the victims, it’s never your fault’ is absolutely nothing to do with Hillsborough, but everything to do with all the other incidents that are seriously underreported or twisted to have zero Liverpool fan negative connotations .
Blame the sun in 1989 for the mass media being scared of reporting any wrong doings ............... we all know (including the media ) know what the victims song is about but sadly the media simply are afraid of standing up to them.

They even had a parade on the anniversary of Heysel which sumps them up perfectly............ they as a club want it erased from history and its up to every decent fan throughout the land to remind the world the damage and the shame they caused to our game in 1985.
 
Lol, we could be here for another 50 pages , I mean you’ll need to specify which particular coach attack you’re referring to…

So, @b2w you know anything about a City coach attack?
The one with a video inside the coach on the way to the ground, that you can just about count the individual hits, as there are so many?
The one where the coach was deemed unserviceable for the return journey?
The one where the Liverpool fans were videoed climbing onto police vans to assist their aim?
The one where zero Liverpool fans have been charged with any assault or affray despite the mounds of video evidence, including the aforesaid police van climbing?
The one where City should have called off the match, and asked for Liverpool to be banned /severely fined for not controlling their fans or even condemning them in anyway, especially as it wasnt the 1st or last time?
The one you probably think is just ‘banter’?
Look man.

I'm here to be respectful, learn about the view from the other side of the fence and be civil in the process, something which doesnt seem to be too common in previous Liverpool fans here.

I might ask a dumb question, but literally after the post above you say:

And there’s your problem.
You know nothing but the edited biased highlights of your club’s history.

You want to engage, maybe when prompted you actually, lol, ‘do your own research’, a simple google of ‘Liverpool hacking’ will lead you to it.
From a City fan point of view, it’s a security embarrassment and a ‘why did we settle for only £1m from these lowlifes’ ongoing issue.
From a Liverpool fan point of view- get an education on the mounds of negative Liverpool facts deemed generally unnewsworthy by the vast majority of the media, and then begin to realise that the chant ‘always the victims, it’s never your fault’ is absolutely nothing to do with Hillsborough, but everything to do with all the other incidents that are seriously underreported or twisted to have zero Liverpool fan negative connotations .

So here I am, I'm asking for a non media biased view, then get slaughtered for asking.

Literally the post above says 'you know nothing but the edited biased highlights ' then tells me to Google it??? Seems like the best way to get a crap, biased view.

If you wondered, yes I did Google it and funnily enough it's not a widely promoted topic.

And yes I've seen the full videos of the bus attacks. It's completely disgraceful.
 
So here I am, I'm asking for a non media biased view, then get slaughtered for asking.

Literally the post above says 'you know nothing but the edited biased highlights ' then tells me to Google it??? Seems like the best way to get a crap, biased view.

If you wondered, yes I did Google it and funnily enough it's not a widely promoted topic.
‘so here i am’ - yep reaffirming that you have previously lived in the non negative Liverpool bubble

’google’ - yep, because amazingly it was actually reported on …but..

’not widely promoted’ … yep, by one media outlet, and another example of the shutting down and complete lack of negative liverpool reporting.

i think your next topic for googling should be ‘Colin mafham’, an actual journalist who spoke out …and got hounded out of their 15 year job … and You wonder why ‘not widely promoted’ is a very accurate description for negative Liverpool reporting… always the vic..


I will give you a pat for not going City bingo, but I’m unsure on how long you’ll be able to refrain.
 
  • Like
Reactions: b2w
‘so here i am’ - yep reaffirming that you have previously lived in the non negative Liverpool bubble

’google’ - yep, because amazingly it was actually reported on …but..

’not widely promoted’ … yep, by one media outlet, and another example of the shutting down and complete lack of negative liverpool reporting.

i think your next topic for googling should be ‘Colin mafham’, an actual journalist who spoke out …and got hounded out of their 15 year job … and You wonder why ‘not widely promoted’ is a very accurate description for negative Liverpool reporting… always the vic..


I will give you a pat for not going City bingo, but I’m unsure on how long you’ll be able to refrain.

On the last point - haha, TBF made me grin. Let's see. ;)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top