eastmanc
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Nov 2010
- Messages
- 10,252
- Team supported
- Manchester city
Joey fucking Barton really!
Last edited:
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
RACHACE
Well-Known Member
Yeah but those pensioners get a prime view of that golden Cockerell, so they should put up and shut up.The Kane transfer has given the £100m of pure profit. They have loads available to spend. They won’t mind. They’ll just charge pensioners fill whack to watch them finish 6th.
Bluesince1979
Well-Known Member
No club could afford to buy them thoughflogging home grown assets is like selling the family silver but it’s so lucrative in FFP terms clubs will be forced to do it. Local lads in the 1st team will become a thing of the past.
It’s obvious that the whole thing is starting to fall apart and is likely to unravel very quickly, possibly in the next few months. It is a fuck up of truly epic proportions and turning the league into a fucking farce.
The worry is that our charges get caught up in that collapse leaving an intentional and tedious question mark against our name. Just hope on this occasion the club is more strident in defending its position, and pointing the finger, than it has been hitherto.
There will always be a question mark over our name mate.
Fuck them.
Just win/get rid of the charges in any way we can then carry on winning.
gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
I know that mate, but the club has a degree of control over how much, which I suspect they won’t sufficiently exercise. I expect any statement in those circumstances will pull its punches. Hope I’m wrong, but experience teaches me I’m likely to be right.There will always be a question mark over our name mate.
r.soleofsalford
Well-Known Member
I know that mate, but the club has a degree of control over how much, which I suspect they won’t sufficiently exercise. I expect any statement in those circumstances will pull its punches. Hope I’m wrong, but experience teaches me I’m likely to be right.
Sadly I think you are correct.
Khaldoon said the same thing right at the beginning of ffp. He knew it would end in tears.I've not known any industry that would actively prevent investment.
Not to mention extra cheese.Yeah but those pensioners get a prime view of that golden Cockerell, so they should put up and shut up.
gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
I hope I’m wrong mate.Sadly I think you are correct.
r.soleofsalford
Well-Known Member
I hope I’m wrong mate.
Me too.
gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
It has happened occasionally!Me too.
burning blue soul
Well-Known Member
Yes, but it's not about those 70 clubs in the pyramid. It's about two clubs. They are all that matters, and if they must burn the house down around everyone if it suits them, they will do it.The fact January's transfer window spending was 84% lower than last January should tell the PL that what they are doing is choking the bandwidth. Which dribbles down the slippery slope to the champ & leagues 1&2 who’s clubs will eventually start to hit financial icebergs due to the lack of money in the game
wolviedinho
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 19 Oct 2010
- Messages
- 23,940
- Location
- Doublethink
- Team supported
- Super City from Maine Road(not wolves)
FFP Ponzi scheme. The red clubs have hoodwinked the rest into propping them up financially by not competing and handing over their best players.
Sooner it crumbles the better. City would be wise to litigate until it tumbles. Then we can argue it was a witch hunt from the start and the main reason for not disclosing sensitive commercial information.
Let’s hope it’s the start of the end of these ridiculous rules.
Sooner it crumbles the better. City would be wise to litigate until it tumbles. Then we can argue it was a witch hunt from the start and the main reason for not disclosing sensitive commercial information.
Let’s hope it’s the start of the end of these ridiculous rules.
ZanteWeatherman
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 1,224
- Team supported
- Manchester City
I refuse to watch anything to do with Barton. He's a no-mark shitwit.Same with Joey Barton on his podcast, says it’s well known in football circles we inflated sponsorships to circumvent FFP and we voted for more strict financial limits to stop Newcastle/Villa etc joining us at the top table. You feel like your pissing into the wind with the constant lies and besmirching of our club
oxopop
Well-Known Member
You are right mate.I know that mate, but the club has a degree of control over how much, which I suspect they won’t sufficiently exercise. I expect any statement in those circumstances will pull its punches. Hope I’m wrong, but experience teaches me I’m likely to be right.
Kinkys Left Foot
Well-Known Member
You have to laugh. Gary Neville cannot understand how Citys revenue can be higher than uniteds. So let me get this straight Gary, the most publicised, Investigated, commented on sponsorship contract deals in World football, where the values for the major sponsors contracts were openly discussed and stated in court findings.
Where new shirt manufacturers sponsorship deal values are openly available on the Internet along with revenue from all competitions and you can include TV revenue in with that too.
Better still open sources like Swiss Ramble who do a fantastic job of laying it all out for you. Your rags have won next to fuck all in a decade where City have hoovered up silverware after silverware. Yet you still cannot understand? I'd suggest you're thick as a pisstone then Gary. Either that or you're lying through your back teeth to appease and confirm the conspiracy theorists amongst your dickhead twitter following and other morons who listen to your utterings on social media platforms. I suspect its the latter so just fuck off Gary, you're fucking boring us with your uninformed bullshit.
Where new shirt manufacturers sponsorship deal values are openly available on the Internet along with revenue from all competitions and you can include TV revenue in with that too.
Better still open sources like Swiss Ramble who do a fantastic job of laying it all out for you. Your rags have won next to fuck all in a decade where City have hoovered up silverware after silverware. Yet you still cannot understand? I'd suggest you're thick as a pisstone then Gary. Either that or you're lying through your back teeth to appease and confirm the conspiracy theorists amongst your dickhead twitter following and other morons who listen to your utterings on social media platforms. I suspect its the latter so just fuck off Gary, you're fucking boring us with your uninformed bullshit.
Scaring Europe to Death
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 31 Oct 2014
- Messages
- 5,173
Not sure if he's thick or quite the opposite and fully aware that the next generation will boast a predominantly higher proportion of City supporters than the current Overlap/Athletic subscribers.You have to laugh. Gary Neville cannot understand how Citys revenue can be higher than uniteds. So let me get this straight Gary, the most publicised, Investigated, commented on sponsorship contract deals in World football, where the values for the major sponsors contracts were openly discussed and stated in court findings.
Where new shirt manufacturers sponsorship deal values are openly available on the Internet along with revenue from all competitions and you can include TV revenue in with that too.
Better still open sources like Swiss Ramble who do a fantastic job of laying it all out for you. Your rags have won next to fuck all in a decade where City have hoovered up silverware after silverware. Yet you still cannot understand? I'd suggest you're thick as a pisstone then Gary. Either that or you're lying through your back teeth to appease and confirm the conspiracy theorists amongst your dickhead twitter following and other morons who listen to your utterings on social media platforms. I suspect its the latter so just fuck off Gary, you're fucking boring us with your uninformed bullshit.
That's why he's so desperate for the supposed regeneration of Old Trafford to coincide with a huge punishment for City.
BlueRockape
Well-Known Member
You should post this on his twatter acountYou have to laugh. Gary Neville cannot understand how Citys revenue can be higher than uniteds. So let me get this straight Gary, the most publicised, Investigated, commented on sponsorship contract deals in World football, where the values for the major sponsors contracts were openly discussed and stated in court findings.
Where new shirt manufacturers sponsorship deal values are openly available on the Internet along with revenue from all competitions and you can include TV revenue in with that too.
Better still open sources like Swiss Ramble who do a fantastic job of laying it all out for you. Your rags have won next to fuck all in a decade where City have hoovered up silverware after silverware. Yet you still cannot understand? I'd suggest you're thick as a pisstone then Gary. Either that or you're lying through your back teeth to appease and confirm the conspiracy theorists amongst your dickhead twitter following and other morons who listen to your utterings on social media platforms. I suspect its the latter so just fuck off Gary, you're fucking boring us with your uninformed bullshit.
I know that mate, but the club has a degree of control over how much, which I suspect they won’t sufficiently exercise. I expect any statement in those circumstances will pull its punches. Hope I’m wrong, but experience teaches me I’m likely to be right.
Well they will have had six years to write the statement so you’d hope they get it right.
I do agree however, if the verdict goes in our favour the statement should be breathing fire over the football world.
You only get one chance at that statement and it will be the reference point for the club’s position in perpetuity.