PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

This is what we've been saying from day one about FFP, PSR or whatever they want to call their financial rules.

If you are charitable enough to assume good faith, it is completely flawed in it's economic assumptions. If it is allowed to remain in it's current form, it will kill our national game up and down the pyramid. Eventually even the redshirt clubs have got to realise this?

The last few transfer windows all levels of clubs have been negatively affected by these rules. It started earlier with the smaller clubs, and they will always be hit the hardest, because they can never be allowed to make the investments that drive growth, sustainability, and profitability. The market is starting to stagnate, clubs just let their squad tick over because they are hemmed in, they've physically got the finances to make sensible moves but they're held back from doing it. Every single club up and down the country is weaker because of FFP. It has the opposite effect of it's supposed intent. It forces clubs to mismanage their squads AND their finances, in order to fit into these arbitrary regulations.

It's basically the footballing world's version of austerity, it has the same effect on the footballing economy as austerity does on the national economy, and it comes from the same flawed line of thinking (again charitable to both philosophies to assume they are in good faith without ulterior motives).

Well done to Notts Forest for speaking in the way that they have in their club statement, both stern and precise in their reasoning and condemnation of the EPL. I would advise clubs like Forest especially, like Everton especially, and others who have had their businesses affected, to fight the league on the legal stage, not merely in the wishy-washy sports courts but in the actual court system of this country, pursue the anti-competition angle and get as much compensation out of them as you can, because there are numorous legitimate cases to be made that it is unlawful.
thing is they voted for it or atleast 14 clubs did
 
thing is they voted for it or atleast 14 clubs did
Not Forest, they weren't in the EPL at the time. I'm not really interested in a kind of karmic reap-what-you-sow approach to the issue anyways, there's more important things at stake, and crucially the law isn't concerned with that sentiment either. It's irrelevant who voted for it and who voted against, the nature of the framework is still anti-competition and it's the organisation that proposed it that is ultimately culpable.
 
It has been a long time for the penny to drop for the clubs who have gone along with the redtops and spurs and left themselves open to what is now coming home to roost.

Clearly in their quest to stop City becoming successful, thankfully unsuccessfully, there is now the collateral damage of the less wealthy teams in the PL being punished and fucked over.

Surely the admittedly totally blinkered chaimen of the affected clubs must group together and fight back against the bloody yank owned clubs who control the PL and their puppets.
 
It has been a long time for the penny to drop for the clubs who have gone along with the redtops and spurs and left themselves open to what is now coming home to roost.

Clearly in their quest to stop City becoming successful, thankfully unsuccessfully, there is now the collateral damage of the less wealthy teams in the PL being punished and fucked over.

Surely the admittedly totally blinkered chaimen of the affected clubs must group together and fight back against the bloody yank owned clubs who control the PL and their puppets.
I assume most of them figured from the beginning that they didn't have much power to stop any of this from being introduced. If they do at some point start a co-ordinated push against FFP it's going to be a long, difficult battle that will take up effort and resources - yet another drain on them financially.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.