It's Quiet 18 - Wanna ring the bell?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I don't give a shit apart from what he brings on the pitch and that applies to every player at our club.

I am a City fan, not a fanboy of Grealish.

The Grealish at Villa was a mavric of a player, hugely overrated but for them the heartbeat of the side, for us, despite a excellent period in the treble season, he has been underwhelming.

I find the recent fan boy worship of certain players in the game to be utterly weird.
Imagine being a fanboy of fucking Grealish..
 
Museum Of Ice Cream Tickets GIFs - Find & Share on GIPHY
 
To say he's been an "average signing" is very unfair.

He's a different player to the Grealish that was at Aston Villa, At Villa Dean Smith gave him a free role basically allowed him to play anywhere. It's different for him under Pep were he's told to stay high and wide and hold his position.

I think he's been superb for us, He's doing what's asked of him under Pep, He was sensational in the treble winning season, Unfortunately he picked up injuries last season but the games he did play he was really good.

The media in particular are judging him on his goals and assists which is pretty silly especially with the job he's been asked to do in our team, He's brilliant at what he's does and that's making the pitch as big as possible, Attracting players to the ball, Making space for his team mates, Keeping possession and winning fouls.

Anyway everybody has there own opinion on Grealish, Me personally I'm a big fan of his game.
IMHO, the price impacts expectations for him, the crazy 100M outlay perhaps isn’t what he should be judged on, he’ll never be our best player of that I’m sure, I’m not sure he’s even in out best 11 but he should be compared with others omitting the transfer fee.
 
IMHO, the price impacts expectations for him, the crazy 100M outlay perhaps isn’t what he should be judged on, he’ll never be our best player of that I’m sure, I’m not sure he’s even in out best 11 but he should be compared with others omitting the transfer fee.
That's the issue with all transfers that go over 100M.

The expectation is often too great and a vast majority simply have been poor deals for that reason.
 
That's the issue with all transfers that go over 100M.

The expectation is often too great and a vast majority simply have been poor deals for that reason.
But it wasn’t his fault he cost 100M, he brings control, dominance and stability to our team but sadly lacks end product.
 


Surely it's something like 15m quid + Gundo for Cancelo?

I thought it said they letting him go for free to save the salary register Olmo. Meaning gundo fee = 0m quid. Why is Cancelo = Gundo + 15quid = make sense?
Why don't you just say we should just give away Cancelo for 15M quid?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top