No, one of the independent panel from memory.
So said Goebbels.Football 365 is little better than Pravda.
You work for them?So said Goebbels.
I'd worry if Rosen was on the panel, big difference between being represented by Pannick whose motive is more likely professional pride and a cracking pot of wonga rather than any allegiance. Let's face it Barristers are "professional story tellers" liars to suit the narrative.Rosen, who probably won't be on the panel.
My view is if the club are happy to have their defence in the hands of Pannick, who is also an Arsenal fan apparently, then we shouldn't worry about Rosen.
Not me, mate.I think @gordondaviesmoustache once posted about his legal brethren losing their collective plots when it came to football. We are all rabidly positive about the club we support, others with a legal intelligence are not immune to hating and denigrating other clubs, especially ours that's been the subject of an outrageous negative media campaign.
Fair enough, someone from your profession definitely posted about normally reasoned people having very biased views about their teams, was a few years ago though.Not me, mate.
Perfectly stands to reason in certain circumstances, but pretty sure I’ve never posted in those terms, because plenty will be able to park that. Only professional thing to do. So no reason for me to highlight it, because I don’t think it’s representative. Think most people can put that to one side.Fair enough, someone from your profession definitely posted about normally reasoned people having very biased views about their teams, was a few years ago though.
No problem, I've got a wide circle of friends who range from a demographic of different finances/businesses/ jobs including Rags but some of them who normaly have a balanced outlook on life dissipates when Football, especially, City's current situation, is discussed.Perfectly stands to reason in certain circumstances, but pretty sure I’ve never posted in those terms, because plenty will be able to park that. Only professional thing to do. So no reason for me to highlight it, because I don’t think it’s representative. Think most people can put that to one side.
No problem, I've got a wide circle of friends who range from a demographic of different finances/businesses/ jobs including Rags but some of them who normaly have a balanced outlook on life dissipates when Football, especially, City's current situation, is discussed.
Today one of them said "tomorrow is the start of your demise and there won't be a Man City in two years". That's how indoctrinated and influenced they've become. I asked what the charges were, he didn't have the first clue.
Today one of them said "tomorrow is the start of your demise and there won't be a Man City in two years". That's how indoctrinated and influenced they've become. I asked what the charges were, he didn't have the first clue.
I'd worry if Rosen was on the panel, big difference between being represented by Pannick whose motive is more likely professional pride and a cracking pot of wonga rather than any allegiance. Let's face it Barristers are "professional story tellers" liars to suit the narrative.
I think @gordondaviesmoustache once posted about his legal brethren losing their collective plots when it came to football. We are all rabidly positive about the club we support, others with a legal intelligence are not immune to hating and denigrating other clubs, especially ours that's been the subject of an outrageous negative media campaign.
what a **** of a friend you have there!!
Id go shag his wife
It’ll last more than a day or so, buckle up Blues115 wankathon on the BBC.
If not already I'd give the sports news a miss for a day or so at least.
It's always a bit crap but, it should go quiet on this matter once the doors close today, unless there's leaks which won't look too good on the Prem.It’ll last more than a day or so, buckle up Blues
Fucking harsh on Michael Antonio that mate. Not the most gifted footballer in the world but he’s definitely a trier. Everything that Rashford is not.He'd be a Messi-esque in his first trail game - sign a lucrative contract - then revert into Michail Antonio for four years until his contract was nearly up - rinse and repeat.
Same with this thread.115 wankathon on the BBC.
If not already I'd give the sports news a miss for a day or so at least.
They only journalist who has fought our corner is Samuel and more recently his views have seem to have changed. Siege mentality is required and as you say if we are cleared time to take no prisoners, Dippers, Rags and the media are all going to get it.Not one newspaper or media outlet says we could be found not guilty.
Every single one of them has us down as guilty and what the punishment could be.
I really hope that we take every single one of these twats to the cleaners when the dust settles.