They probably won't have even started writing up their findings yet, will be nothing to leak. The lawyers on both sides might have an inkling how it's going but doubt anything more than that.I feel the silence is quite telling, I have no doubt that something would have been leaked by now if we had lost the major charges. The more I look at this the more I cant see anything other than a loss for the PL.
2009-18 imagine what they would uncover if they went back to the slur phallic and Redknapp eraAre the charges only up to 2018 and our case has been resolved by UEFA.
Facts don't matter. A simple headline "could Court be taken to court by Euro elite clubs" would do it.Are the charges only up to 2018 and our case has been resolved by UEFA.
Except a Super League would be more of a cartel than the PL ( just with extra teams involved ).Stalemate is the likely outcome, what-ever the verdict. A tko followed by appeal. a legal firm's dream; more wishful thinking by the Prem presented as facts, such as possible expulsion, compo, titles being stripped, championships re-awarded, etc. Since it's inception, the prem has been run as a cartel, by and for three clubs, earning billions for murdoch through sky, and fortunes for the clubs. Allowing the home team to keep all the profits from a game automatically widens the rift between the cartel and the rest of football, as intended. In some ways, a super-league now seems less of a very bad idea, imho
correct but the rule is simply, does the manager have a contract or not. There's no mention of exact renumeration is needed or a second contract with a separate company is not allowed. So the mancini stuff is pretty much in the bin from the start. That's before the statute of limitations even needs consideringI'm guessing the Mancini contract stuff doesn't remotely equate to fraud even if we were guilty as charged on that one? Not that I'm saying we are of course but if that turns out to be the only one they get us on then it's fuck all in the grand scheme of things and any **** demanding compensation or points deductions or titles stripped based on that is a.......****!
No you said something that makes no senseLet it go pal…..
It was a silly joke that you have misunderstood.
The mancini stuff was before ffp and so can't have had a negative impact on any other club right?
No you said something that makes no sense
Of course, you could let it go tooMade no sense to you but made sense to me & couple of others.
They probably won't have even started writing up their findings yet, will be nothing to leak. The lawyers on both sides might have an inkling how it's going but doubt anything more than that.
Of course, you could let it go too
i know nothing but i would have thought a stalemate is impossible. Either the PL can prove the allegations or they can't. Surely?Stalemate is the likely outcome, what-ever the verdict. A tko followed by appeal. a legal firm's dream; more wishful thinking by the Prem presented as facts, such as possible expulsion, compo, titles being stripped, championships re-awarded, etc. Since it's inception, the prem has been run as a cartel, by and for three clubs, earning billions for murdoch through sky, and fortunes for the clubs. Allowing the home team to keep all the profits from a game automatically widens the rift between the cartel and the rest of football, as intended. In some ways, a super-league now seems less of a very bad idea, imho
Stalemate is the likely outcome, what-ever the verdict. A tko followed by appeal. a legal firm's dream; more wishful thinking by the Prem presented as facts, such as possible expulsion, compo, titles being stripped, championships re-awarded, etc. Since it's inception, the prem has been run as a cartel, by and for three clubs, earning billions for murdoch through sky, and fortunes for the clubs. Allowing the home team to keep all the profits from a game automatically widens the rift between the cartel and the rest of football, as intended. In some ways, a super-league now seems less of a very bad idea, imho
Yeah, that makes sense, but there won't be any knowledge of actual fraud if and until the verdict. I would have thought that would be the start of the limitation for any potential compensation based on fraud.Because they have been on notice of that potential fraud since Der Speigel - 6 years ago
Does it really matter?No you said something that makes no sense
Doesn't need to be knowledge of an established/proven fraud. It is for the claimant to commence its work once it has sufficient confidence to justify embarking on the preliminaries to issue proceedings. Pretty sure the latest date is around Der Speigel for these allegations (although obviously we'd need to see the judgment). Put it this way, no claimant could argue the first time they thought they may have a claim vs City is sometime in the future from now. They have all been considering it for years (if claims proven).Yeah, that makes sense, but there won't be any knowledge of actual fraud if and until the verdict. I would have thought that would be the start of the limitation for any potential compensation based on fraud.
Hedging their bets I suppose.
Agree. A stalemate is not even remotely an option. What are we doing here? The lack of faith and shit trickling out of the asses of some supporters is a bit troubling. Nothing has changed. Sit tight and show some faith...i know nothing but i would have thought a stalemate is impossible. Either the PL can prove the allegations or they can't. Surely?
I’m assuming that the two sets of lawyers will make separate submissions to the panel and won’t be interrogated together so there will be little likelihood that either team will know how they are doing. Is that how it works as in a court of law you would generally get an inkling for which way the wind is blowing?They probably won't have even started writing up their findings yet, will be nothing to leak. The lawyers on both sides might have an inkling how it's going but doubt anything more than that.