PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[Stoned Rose]

So you know when ur missus is in a mood with u, u dont know what uve done or why but theres indications, its like that

Soft signals and soft cocks.

 

[Centurions]

The PL cannot enforce any transfer bans.

No, but they can ask Fifa to put one in, although unless I've missed something (99% guaranteed nowadays I'm afraid) then I'm not sure why you posted that?

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

Yes I did.
He said there will be no rules, which isn’t true

I accept that ,obviously, but at least he’s acknowledged how catastrophic this will be for the PL if we are cleared. Baby steps and all that!

 

[Micky Blue]

Apologies if this has already been asked. And I’m not wanting to get into the politics around the article.

But with Lord Pannick soon to be taking on the government over private schools VAT.
Would this indicate that city dont believe they will need him for any subsequent appeal of the outcome?

Also the timing of this story coming out coincides with a change in tone from certain outlets and city’s hard soft signals.

Access Restricted

www.telegraph.co.uk

 

[Blue Maverick]

If we get a fine will Khaldoon fight it? I thought he wanted us cleared totally, seems a fine would go against that, he wants us completely exonerated.

 

[The Light Was Yellow Sir]

Apologies if this has already been asked. And I’m not wanting to get into the politics around the article.

But with Lord Pannick soon to be taking on the government over private schools VAT.
Would this indicate that city dont believe they will need him for any subsequent appeal of the outcome?

Also the timing of this story coming out coincides with a change in tone from certain outlets and city’s hard soft signals.

Access Restricted

www.telegraph.co.uk

He’ll lose that one pretty quickly….

 

[Centurions]

I accept that ,obviously, but at least he’s acknowledged how catastrophic this will be for the PL if we are cleared. Baby steps and all that!

I am constantly & equally amused and amazed that no matter how gushing an article on City that is published, that someone will focus on one line, phrase or even a single word and then find the whole thing negative.

 

[cheekybids]

So you know when ur missus is in a mood with u, u dont know what uve done or why but theres indications, its like that

So we will be “fiiinnneeee!”

 

[Centurions]

Apologies if this has already been asked. And I’m not wanting to get into the politics around the article.

But with Lord Pannick soon to be taking on the government over private schools VAT.
Would this indicate that city dont believe they will need him for any subsequent appeal of the outcome?

Also the timing of this story coming out coincides with a change in tone from certain outlets and city’s hard soft signals.

Access Restricted

www.telegraph.co.uk

This has been on the books and well known about for a good while now. The two have no influence on each other.

 

[mancboy]

So we will be “fiiinnneeee!”

Or we wont know what we've done but if we dont know they're not gonna tell us

 

[mancboy]

Soft signals and soft cocks.

Oi i resemble that remark

 

[Nightmare Walking]

The interesting thing with that Mirror article is that it is the first time I have ever seen it recorded in print that we have American ownership, alongside the Abu Dhabi proportion.

 

[Stoned Rose]

Oi i resemble that remark

Pics?

 

[Micky Blue]

Pics?

Fucking hell haha

You’re definitely my favourite contributor on here.

 

[BridgyDids]

I see, what's your thinking then? They've been forced to remove?

Maybe not forced, but possibly think it’s a wise idea to, as I’m sure as they would be seen as “publishers” of the comments (which would be full of scurrilous posts) they would want to run the risk of any comeback.

Whatever it is, the timing is intriguing

 

[blue b4 the moon]

If we get a fine will Khaldoon fight it? I thought he wanted us cleared totally, seems a fine would go against that, he wants us completely exonerated.

I guess we'd take some sort of no cooperation one as assuming we've not said fill your boots here's the keys etc a fine for not giving everything they've asked for is subjective.

 

[dickie davies]

I guess we'd take some sort of no cooperation one as assuming we've not said fill your boots here's the keys etc a fine for not giving everything they've asked for is subjective.

Which would mean anyone can report that the independent tribunal found us guilty on multiple charges

 

[blue b4 the moon]

Which would mean anyone can report that the independent tribunal found us guilty on multiple charges

Probably, and I've no doubt that should that happen and we get fined they will.

The CAS result showed that and we just sucked the minor miscellaneous up.

 

[Chris in London]

A small and fat claims lawyer, apparently.

I’ve heard of the small claims court.

I’ve never heard of the fat claims court before.

He’s very well qualified, either way.

 

[mancboy]

Pics?

Zoom on my camera aint that good