like i said if that is the threshold i would expect haaland to be getting 8 or 9 pens a game for everytime he is rugby tackled in the box
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Referees’ Performances | 2024/2025
- Thread starter SebastianBlue
- Start date
if that is the new threshold for a penalty i would suggest you are going to say ten penalties a game if all you have to do to get a penalty is run into an opposition player in the penalty and fall over regardless of whether the pl has made a challenge or not.
Agree watch it live it's a coming together and the player actually ran into Dias who did touch the ball then pulled out. You watch just the coming together in super slow motion you can make most coming together a penalty!
Villa's pen last night was typical pen against Manchester City, City would never get that given by VAR in a million years
Funny, also by the referee last night, Dias asked him why he gave that, and he pointed to his ear ????
Now, how can the referee be told to give it ? . The on-field referee never should be overruled unless it's a stone wall penalty and a mistake.
Every corner City had should be given a penalty if Dias was a penalty ? The amount of holding and pulling of shirts, blocking, fouling, O'Reilly was pulled down about 5 times last night
Funny, also by the referee last night, Dias asked him why he gave that, and he pointed to his ear ????
Now, how can the referee be told to give it ? . The on-field referee never should be overruled unless it's a stone wall penalty and a mistake.
Every corner City had should be given a penalty if Dias was a penalty ? The amount of holding and pulling of shirts, blocking, fouling, O'Reilly was pulled down about 5 times last night
I've got bad news for Villa fans - Pawson is their cup semi-final VAR guy.
Based on last night it's good news for them, he'll be their 13th man. The Holte End being the 12th man of course (except when they had to close it).
Isn't it at Wembley?Based on last night it's good news for them, he'll be their 13th man. The Holte End being the 12th man of course (except when they had to close it).
Isn't it at Wembley?
Aye but it'll be there in spirit
Defender gets a (very obvious) touch on the ball before the man = no penalty. That's how it works 99% of the time. I guess we are the 1% and I'm not normally one for all the refs are against us. I just think they're probably a bit shit.
Gray
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 30 May 2004
- Messages
- 28,709
- Team supported
- ABU & The Bus Wreckers
Yes what a soft arsed bunch of players we have got, feed them some red meat.Actually, looking at that. we have committed less fouls than any other premiership team. With the exception of Brentford, were committed over a 100 less than everyone else.
Champions again in 2012
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 13 May 2012
- Messages
- 1,207
- Location
- I'm not really here
- Team supported
- Is there any other team?
But i bet there is no correlation in the number of bookings we have received compared to the other clubsYes what a soft arsed bunch of players we have got, feed them some red meat.
TonyColemansbagofapples
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 24 Sep 2017
- Messages
- 6,535
I thought Tielemans was the referee last night. He never left Pawsons side. Also, does Tielemans ever stay on his feet?
eyalluvitt
Well-Known Member
They always cry ‘not enough contact for a foul’ when our players get hit. Yet trot out ‘well there was contact so technically its a foul’ when it’s our opposition, infuriatingVilla's pen last night was typical pen against Manchester City, City would never get that given by VAR in a million years
Funny, also by the referee last night, Dias asked him why he gave that, and he pointed to his ear ????
Now, how can the referee be told to give it ? . The on-field referee never should be overruled unless it's a stone wall penalty and a mistake.
Every corner City had should be given a penalty if Dias was a penalty ? The amount of holding and pulling of shirts, blocking, fouling, O'Reilly was pulled down about 5 times last night
eyalluvitt
Well-Known Member
Remember Vardy & his teammates constantly initiating contact and diving v young Garcia resulting in 3 pens in one game, laughable brain dead officiating is forever the monkey on our backVilla's pen last night was typical pen against Manchester City, City would never get that given by VAR in a million years
Funny, also by the referee last night, Dias asked him why he gave that, and he pointed to his ear ????
Now, how can the referee be told to give it ? . The on-field referee never should be overruled unless it's a stone wall penalty and a mistake.
Every corner City had should be given a penalty if Dias was a penalty ? The amount of holding and pulling of shirts, blocking, fouling, O'Reilly was pulled down about 5 times last night
eyalluvitt
Well-Known Member
Most ex footballers are not the sharpest knifes in the drawer and dinosaurs when it comes to understanding the rules of the game.I've listen to around 5/6 ex footballers and they all say can't believe referee never gave it! Is it our own bias thinking it was not or marginal? Or is it the grey area in the var rules that make you believe it ain't a penalty if there referee didn't give it on field and the high rule they set is why we believe it shouldn't be given!?
Exeter Blue I am here
Well-Known Member
I've no great issue with the penalty, soft as it was. However, the VAR official conspicuously failed to reciprocate at every City corner, when Gvardiol and O'Reilly were grabbed and held non-stop
to give an absolute direct comparison, if gashfords is a penalty, why is the one on marmoush against palace not a penalty?They always cry ‘not enough contact for a foul’ when our players get hit. Yet trot out ‘well there was contact so technically its a foul’ when it’s our opposition, infuriating
As ive just put there, its the consistency or lack thereof that i take issue with, if gashfords is a penalty then marmoushs against palace has to be a penalty.I've no great issue with the penalty, soft as it was. However, the VAR official conspicuously failed to reciprocate at every City corner, when Gvardiol and O'Reilly were grabbed and held non-stop
Trevor Morley's Tache
Well-Known Member
It doesn't matter if you thought it was a penalty in real time. Pawson didn't, and VAR interfered when it shouldn't have.I didn’t ignore it, thought I covered it in what I said. It was a penalty even in real time to me and not surprised VAR overturned, Pawson from his angle wouldn’t have seen the contact as much.
It’s one of those that if it was us as the attacking side, everyone would be screaming the other way if it wasn’t given.
Trevor Morley's Tache
Well-Known Member
I'm not sure for many of them that their bias is particularly unconscious.Yep.. Dias got some of the ball first and how many times do you hear var tell us it was a coming together plus the referee never gave it so bar has to be high to turn it over! If the referee gave it I wouldn't be happy but I'd except it more because of that bar!
We will see an identical incident and referee won't give it var will agree with him and we will hear that var thought it was a coming together and player got some of the ball! With var they can manipulate it if these var kunts has a unconscious bias