Nah. My stupidity. I missed Bobb. How? i don't know :)
Last edited:
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Tino Livramento
- Thread starter Galvanoth
- Start date
Lord Blue
Well-Known Member
it would help if Stones could stay fit enough to play RB. but he won't so urgh
Longballutd
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 5 Aug 2015
- Messages
- 964
He wouldn’t be playing right back but let’s hope he finds some fitness we could really do with him againit would help if Stones could stay fit enough to play RB. but he won't so urgh
BluestBlue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 25 Apr 2025
- Messages
- 744
- Team supported
- Man City
The same ones that didn’t get a Rodri cover until after he done his ACL. The same ones that didn’t get a proper LB for a decade ?Well obviously our scouts manager and hierarchy think differently.
Whoever made the decision it’s the wrong call as it stands.
Yes but did we make any statement signings though?Pretty average
We’ve won a treble and a record breaking fourth consecutive title in the last three years
B\connellblue
Well-Known Member
There's nothing to suggest we have even made an enquiry about this lad. All pie in the sky.
Bono?Found it.
We need to get rid of 5 players even if we are to sign a HG right back.No not at all. We still need to get rid of 5 foreign players if we were to sign 1. So that restricts us to home grown or nothing until we get rid of a bunch.
But one of the 5 moved on can then be a HG playe like Grealish or Stones.
manimanc
Well-Known Member
What?There's nothing to suggest we have even made an enquiry about this lad. All pie in the sky.
You mean the tinternet and the media have made something up?
I'm shocked I tell thee.
Tugay One Cup
Well-Known Member
There's nothing to suggest we have even made an enquiry about this lad. All pie in the sky.
Nothing other than the numerous reports that we wanted to sign him.
All fair.This is on City mate. If Newcastle are quoting astronomical £100m - £130m prices, I'd understand City's reluctance, but media reports are stating they value Tino at £80m & that City are willing to pay £50m.
£65m plus add-ons should be enough to start serious dialogue between the club's. City must view a 22 year old Livramento as a long-term acquisition to replace Walker who we bought 9 years ago for £50m+.
In view of this, a relative bid for Tino at £65m plus add-ons makes complete sense to me. Livramento's had enough opportunity to kiss the Newcastle badge & say he's going nowhere & Newcastle have had enough time to say Tino's not for sale at any price. Neither has happened.
Other than maybe that 65m figure which is something you have made up yourself.
In fairness, there has been very little of that. It has mostly been just wishful speculation on here, and an itk pop-up here and there.Nothing other than the numerous reports that we wanted to sign him.
In fact there have been more reports that we are Not trying to sign him, that Newcastle don't want to sell him, and that he is being offered a new contract, than that we want to sign him.
IronsideKozuch
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 Aug 2022
- Messages
- 787
Nah, its been well reported we were after him before CWC:In fairness, there has been very little of that. It has mostly been just wishful speculation on here, and an itk pop-up here and there.
In fact there have been more reports that we are Not trying to sign him, that Newcastle don't want to sell him, and that he is being offered a new contract, than that we want to sign him.
Its quite clear we and Newcastle had a huge discrepancy in evaluation. Looks like either Tino's agent put some pressure on Newcastle and lower the fee or its not gonna happen at all.
But I agree with those, who do not want this one to slide and 65 m+add on's is more than justified.
Nah, its been well reported we were after him before CWC:
Its quite clear we and Newcastle had a huge discrepancy in evaluation. Looks like either Tino's agent put some pressure on Newcastle and lower the fee or its not gonna happen at all.
But I agree with those, who do not want this one to slide and 65 m+add on's is more than justified.
That is quite a restrained claim though, which is my point. Usually when there is real attempts, you get all the 'personal terms agreed' claims etc, there has been nothing of the sort yet
blueparrot
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Jun 2012
- Messages
- 33,353
Nah, its been well reported we were after him before CWC:
Its quite clear we and Newcastle had a huge discrepancy in evaluation. Looks like either Tino's agent put some pressure on Newcastle and lower the fee or its not gonna happen at all.
But I agree with those, who do not want this one to slide and 65 m+add on's is more than justified.
I've seen nothing to suggest that Newcastle want to sell or have set any price. Certainly nothing that suggests they would take anything like £65mill or we would go anything near what they would ask.
Also not seen anything from anyone saying he wants and is pushing to leave.
Nunes at right back playing like Maicon at city would be a startIf you’re gonna go to those extremes, I think the XI you put up is better XI Barcelona 2015 and Doku Is better than Prime Ronaldinho and Marmoush reminds me of Maradona in 86 and yeah, Nunez at RB plays like Maicon under Mourinho.
Listen, no one’s saying we are shite, we have a very good squad, but I just believe that it’s no longer the best XI in the league or UCL, Madrid, Barca, PSG, Arsenal and Liverpool teams are all slightly better right now, once again that’s just my opinion.
oakiecokie
Well-Known Member
And that was the reason for our Club winning fuck all in that time.The same ones that didn’t get a Rodri cover until after he done his ACL. The same ones that didn’t get a proper LB for a decade ?
Whoever made the decision it’s the wrong call as it stands.
nmc
Well-Known Member
This is on City mate. If Newcastle are quoting astronomical £100m - £130m prices, I'd understand City's reluctance, but media reports are stating they value Tino at £80m & that City are willing to pay £50m.
£65m plus add-ons should be enough to start serious dialogue between the club's. City must view a 22 year old Livramento as a long-term acquisition to replace Walker who we bought 9 years ago for £50m+.
In view of this, a relative bid for Tino at £65m plus add-ons makes complete sense to me. Livramento's had enough opportunity to kiss the Newcastle badge & say he's going nowhere & Newcastle have had enough time to say Tino's not for sale at any price. Neither has happened.
What if City have floated a figure in the £65m ballpark and it’s been deemed unacceptable. We may have been told, come back with an offer that starts with an 8. What do you expect the club to do? I guess we just wait and hope Newcastle relax their stance and quietly look elsewhere- which is what we seem to be doing.
Speculation seems to be the order of the day at the moment.I've seen nothing to suggest that Newcastle want to sell or have set any price. Certainly nothing that suggests they would take anything like £65mill or we would go anything near what they would ask.
Also not seen anything from anyone saying he wants and is pushing to leave.
Tugay One Cup
Well-Known Member
That is quite a restrained claim though, which is my point. Usually when there is real attempts, you get all the 'personal terms agreed' claims etc, there has been nothing of the sort yet
To be fair the original point was someone asking if we'd even made an enquiry.
And it's pretty obvious that City have asked what it would take to get him, even if we didn't like what we were told.