PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Watched this talksport video and these two presenting it like to come out with why isn’t it done yet why isn’t it more transparent! If found guilty Man City could lose titles trophies!
The same angle every time always what will happen if found guilty! They never do research never take in what “experts” on it say! So I put it down as they are lazy fuckers who can’t be bothered doing any research!
Yeah, what happens if found not guilty is the great unsaid, that can never be uttered.
 
How many times she repeated " these are really series charges " ?

I feel those pundits don't want to club to be relegated only, they also want the club to go to hell.

Take all their titles, their money, and convert their stadium into a prison.
I bet she didn't say anything re series charges at all.


Serious charges, maybe!

;-)
 
Karen Brady talking sense. Winter "they've speeded up VAR - surely they can speed up this process - a time limit perhaps?"
I wonder whether that was meant as a joke or if he really is so utterly clueless. As Karen Brady said getting the correct outcome is more important than the time it takes - or words to that effect.
 
Karen Brady talking sense. Winter "they've speeded up VAR - surely they can speed up this process - a time limit perhaps?"
I wonder whether that was meant as a joke or if he really is so utterly clueless. As Karen Brady said getting the correct outcome is more important than the time it takes - or words to that effect.

They are fucking clueless and they could educate themselves if they were bothered! Love someone to ring them up and ask them if they actually educate themselves on the charges and have they read the cas case that covers 95% of what Romero accused us off!
 
Karen Brady talking sense. Winter "they've speeded up VAR - surely they can speed up this process - a time limit perhaps?"
I wonder whether that was meant as a joke or if he really is so utterly clueless. As Karen Brady said getting the correct outcome is more important than the time it takes - or words to that effect.
Making sense yet talking about the FA not the premier league with regards to the charges and the regulator not getting involved in the rules of the game when discussing the charges and I assume financial sustainability yet later on says regulators sole aim is financial sustainability so will have to get involved in how clubs spend. The rules of the of the game is like offside yet she thinks they are financial etc. saying that UEfA won’t allow the regulator to get involved in this frankly UEFA can do one the nation state takes precedence over UEfA besides the charges are from the premier league. She is clueless
 
Last edited:
Making sense yet talking about the FA not the premier league with regards to the charges and the regulator not getting involved in the rules of the game when discussing the charges and I assume financial sustainability yet later on says regulators sole aim is financial sustainability so will have to get involved in how clubs spend. The rules of the of the game is like offside yet she thinks they are financial etc. saying that UEfA won’t allow the regulator to get involved in this frankly UEFA can do one the nation state takes precedence over UEfA besides the charges are from the premier league. She is clueless
She mentioned the FA in relation to the charges against 'Lucas' [Paqueta] not us.
I assume she meant FIFA not UEFA, as they're the ones that wrote to the FA(?) about their concerns regarding the regulator
 
Just watched the full clip, thanks for sharing it.

Wouldn’t take issue with anything she said there tbh, and without naming Rick Parry, she certainly shamed him over the turned down PL money offer.
Didnt they turn it down because it was less money than previously offered & they had to oppose the independent regulator
 
She mentioned the FA in relation to the charges against 'Lucas' [Paqueta] not us.
I assume she meant FIFA not UEFA, as they're the ones that wrote to the FA(?) about their concerns regarding the regulator
she said that the regulator won’t get involved in finance then later said the opposite
She said the rules game include finance but they don’t rules of the game are like offside
 
Didnt they turn it down because it was less money than previously offered & they had to oppose the independent regulator
Maybe bud, you may well know more than me.

The way she described it, the FL were offered a settlement with more money, but they turned it down and not only that but at the same time wanted a reunification of the 92 clubs back under one organisation - which she said came completely out of the blue to the PL reps involved of which she was one (and after over 30 years of PL success around the world, was a complete non-starter).
 
How many times she repeated " these are really series charges " ?

I feel those pundits don't want to club to be relegated only, they also want the club to go to hell.

Take all their titles, their money, and convert their stadium into a prison.

They show concern for Sheff Wed & Morecambe whilst salivating at the prospect of putting City out of business.
 
Maybe bud, you may well know more than me.

The way she described it, the FL were offered a settlement with more money, but they turned it down and not only that but at the same time wanted a reunification of the 92 clubs back under one organisation - which she said came completely out of the blue to the PL reps involved of which she was one (and after over 30 years of PL success around the world, was a complete non-starter).
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top