chesterbells
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 15 Apr 2010
- Messages
- 26,843
Yep, just head back a few pages …Did I miss the announcement today?
Yep, just head back a few pages …Did I miss the announcement today?


stefan on talksort today must be first time they never changed topic to 115 all everton v burnly and chelsea sporting advantageNot much on the Chelsea 74 either is there !
But the 115 is rolled out again - disgusting
What did City ever do to upset that bitter tosser HERBERT!Anyone see this?
View attachment 169721
“Some commercial litigation experts tell me that negotiation behind the scenes is possible — and that horse-trading could be a reason for the judgment taking so long to land. But the more prevalent view within both football and legal fraternities is that negotiation in this case is highly unlikely.
'With both sides apparently having set their stall out at such diametrically opposing positions, it would be hard to envisage a climb down,' the commercial litigation lawyer explains. 'For example, how can City suddenly agree to accept, say, 75 charges or the Premier League agree to write off 50 others? Not now the proceedings are concluded.'The other clubs would go berserk. I sense that the ruling will be the end of it. My sense, based on nothing specific, is that it was an all or nothing kind of case.'
The view echoes that of Kieran Maguire, co-host of The Price of Football podcast, who concluded in a discussion of the APT ruling on the programme last week: 'Given that the legal costs are likely to be in the realms of £100million to £120m, can you imagine how the other club owners are going to react to, "In the end, it’s a misunderstanding. We'll just give them a fine"?'
A deal was always the way forward on 115. Far too catastrophic for either side to lose.
Top comment:
View attachment 169722
It feels like a large part of what this bullshit is all about. The red shirt clubs conditioning their own fanbases into believing that the Super League is the only way they can be free of City’s “cheating”. In the event of our being found ‘not guilty’, there’ll be a cartel orchestrated media storm about the PL’s inability to punish us and then they’ll re-float the Super League nonsense, only this time with us excluded, sine die. We’re dealing with utter cnuts…….Think this may be their strategy. Blame City for them having to join a European super league.
It feels like a large part of what this bullshit is all about. The red shirt clubs conditioning their own fanbases into believing that the Super League is the only way they can be free of City’s “cheating”. In the event of our being found ‘not guilty’, there’ll be a cartel orchestrated media storm about the PL’s inability to punish us and then they’ll re-float the Super League nonsense, only this time with us excluded, sine die. We’re dealing with utter cnuts…….
Interesting first post after being a member since 2020I heard today from a good source that they could be an announcement this Friday. Reason for the long delay is didn’t want it hastily arranged and needed to be properly planned. Sequential approach to delivering of both cases with smaller one last week to avoid stitch up accusations etc. I have not seen the ruling summary yet but apparently prem league look pretty terrible in all of this so hopefully that means we should be cleared .
Hmmmm....I heard today from a good source that they could be an announcement this Friday. Reason for the long delay is didn’t want it hastily arranged and needed to be properly planned. Sequential approach to delivering of both cases with smaller one last week to avoid stitch up accusations etc. I have not seen the ruling summary yet but apparently prem league look pretty terrible in all of this so hopefully that means we should be cleared .
Interesting first post after being a member since 2020
I heard a City fan bummed his mum and with no lubeWhat did City ever do to upset that bitter tosser HERBERT!
You are Lord PannickI heard today from a good source that they could be an announcement this Friday. Reason for the long delay is didn’t want it hastily arranged and needed to be properly planned. Sequential approach to delivering of both cases with smaller one last week to avoid stitch up accusations etc. I have not seen the ruling summary yet but apparently prem league look pretty terrible in all of this so hopefully that means we should be cleared .
Or could be Richard MastersProbably just shy and a slow developer.
That’s @Ric burner account.Interesting first post after being a member since 2020
I heard today from a good source that they could be an announcement this Friday. Reason for the long delay is didn’t want it hastily arranged and needed to be properly planned. Sequential approach to delivering of both cases with smaller one last week to avoid stitch up accusations etc. I have not seen the ruling summary yet but apparently prem league look pretty terrible in all of this so hopefully that means we should be cleared .
So let me get this clear: you’ve not seen the ruling but you know what’s happening? Is that correct?I heard today from a good source that they could be an announcement this Friday. Reason for the long delay is didn’t want it hastily arranged and needed to be properly planned. Sequential approach to delivering of both cases with smaller one last week to avoid stitch up accusations etc. I have not seen the ruling summary yet but apparently prem league look pretty terrible in all of this so hopefully that means we should be cleared .
Thought that was Wetleg or one of its reincarnations like ElleBla.That’s @Ric burner account.