PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

KS55 said:
The test for all these guys is: do they examine the evidence as far as it is available. The answer is invariably: NO. They can’t even be bothered to read the CAS cases.
Click to expand...
would like someone more clued up than me to pick it apart though
i assume his bias will skew his thinking
 
johnny crossan said:
View attachment 178777
looks the part.
Click to expand...

My god this is so fucking tiresome.

Lets say he is right. Etihad only paid a small amount of its sponsorship, why the fuck would they commit a fraud and led our owner pay the rest ? according to him and all these assholes then City are state owned , Etihad sure is so why didnt they take the money out of the other state pockets to pay the sponsorship . I just cant see the crime here . Etihad pays City X amount , who pays for it who cares . Same goes for Etisalat, Aabar & other Abu Dhabi-linked sponsors. I just dont see the crime. If and that is the biggest question these Sponsorship deals are judge to be fair value and legal by UEFA and PL should be the main question here. @slbsn @Prestwich_Blue what do you think .

And about our spending , we have not broken any rules since 2014 about spending but Forrest,Everton,Leicester,Man utd, Chelsea have. If we had we would have been charged for braking the spending rules i have no doubts.
 
Last edited:
Cityfan1977 said:
He has 41.000 Followers there are a lot of assholes that gives a fuck and it is very bad for City image
Click to expand...
City's image? Our image couldn't be any fucking worse to the outside world. Bar our fans (even some of them are fucking wrong'uns) very very few people think we are anything other than cheating cunts.
The horse has long since bolted on that score so another snivelling little cockroach throwing his twopence in isn't going to make any difference.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top