PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

People who are somewhat informed about the situation, are you confident we'll beat the charges? I'm not asking for wishful thinking here, but that the charges themselves is an inflated witch hunt?

Yes, I can say that to you.

The PL doesn't have a snowflake's chance in hell of proving the most serious allegations because, even if the club did everything alleged, they couldn't prove it without access to incriminating financial records from Etihad or ADUG (as was), which they won't have, or a whistle-blower from inside Abu Dhabi, which no-one, I suspect, is stupid enough to be.

Add to that, the fact that the owner would have to be stupid, which he isn't by a long chalk, to think of such a hair-brained way of getting around FFP, and the absolutely aggressive denials from the club, and I think it's fair to say we are on safe ground.

The minor allegations I don't care about, every club breaches some rules sometimes.
 
Yes, I can say that to you.

The PL doesn't have a snowflake's chance in hell of proving the most serious allegations because, even if the club did everything alleged, they couldn't prove it without access to incriminating financial records from Etihad or ADUG (as was), which they won't have, or a whistle-blower from inside Abu Dhabi, which no-one, I suspect, is stupid enough to be.

Add to that, the fact that the owner would have to be stupid, which he isn't by a long chalk, to think of such a hair-brained way of getting around FFP, and the absolutely aggressive denials from the club, and I think it's fair to say we are on safe ground.

The minor allegations I don't care about, every club breaches some rules sometimes.

Cheers – let's hope for the best
 
Who? Never heard of him. Maybe email him and see if he replies to confirm.

One of Englands best attorneys, according to rumours! There were lots of talks he would lead City's case, but maybe I got that part wrong.
 
One of Englands best attorneys, according to rumours! There were lots of talks he would lead City's case, but maybe I got that part wrong.
I was only joking with you, apologies. Welcome to Bluemoon.

Yes, he is involved in (and leading) City's case.
 
not really, was here years ago but decided to fck off because of the attitude and people overly sensitive to fair criticism of players and performance. seems this place haven't changed much.
I would understand the attitude if I rooted for a rival, but I don't. City fans should be able to get along, what is the fkng point otherwise.
Welcome back, Ajay :)
 
Thanks for this, much appreciated. Lots of people claimed it was due to allegations being time barred that cleared us. I'm not sure that was the case of not, but if there were no financial wrong doings, it's good for this case I guess.
I believe 1 year of Etihad was time barred. The Etisalat contract was time barred also. Opposing fans will always latch onto things like that. The big prize for Uefa was proving wrong doing in the Etihad contract and they did not achieve it. Interestingly, unless the PL can prove fraud there could be a lot of charges that are time barred this time round too.
 
People who are somewhat informed about the situation, are you confident we'll beat the charges? I'm not asking for wishful thinking here, but that the charges themselves is an inflated witch hunt?
I don’t think I’m somewhat informed, I’m simply no more or less confused than many others. There is a body of opinion that the case is largely a rerun of the CAS hearing. CAS found there was no evidence to support any of those charges and many are completely sceptical that the PL have any new compelling evidence. Stefan, however, assures us that the Pl would not have brought the case unless unless it were confident of winning. But when the charges were made public there was real confusion: City’s lawyers had to inform the PL that they were actually charging the club with, among other things, not cutting the grass short enough and not entering the FA cup - in the season we actually won it! So , it seems easier to make sensible analysis of the mad hatter’s tea party than suggest a likely outcome to all this.
 
We'll see what happens. Would be surprised if we don't get a verdict before June.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top